From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "Qiliang Yuan" <odys.yuan@gmail.com>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
"Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/22] bpf: Let the patch list remove instructions
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 05:29:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMIRYFU9YEX1.14HBEXD0UQR7H@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261030-bpf-verifier-patch-batch-v2-7-55cd43439f7c@gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 30, 2026 at 04:51 AM Qiliang Yuan <odys.yuan@gmail.com> wrote:
> bpf_patch_image_install(prog, &img);
[...]
> + /* before subprogs are removed, since it looks at them */
> for (i = 0; i < env->func_ptr_cnt; i++) {
> struct bpf_func_ptr *fp = &env->func_ptrs[i];
> + int subprog;
>
> if (fp->xlated_off == BPF_FUNC_PTR_DELETED)
> continue;
> + if (bpf_patch_image_deleted(&img, fp->xlated_off)) {
> + subprog = bpf_find_subprog(env, fp->xlated_off);
> + if (subprog <= 0 ||
Sashiko is right. It's real, and it crashes the kernel.
bpf_patch_image_install() already set prog->len to the new length.
bpf_find_subprog() gets an old offset and compares it with prog->len.
When the prog shrinks enough it doesn't find a live function.
The func ptr is marked as deleted and the slot in .rodata becomes NULL.
It needs two things:
- the first insn of the function goes away as a nop
- this commit removes at least (end of prog - start of function) insns
Plain C hits it:
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
struct st { int a; } g = { .a = 10 };
#define OP(name, expr) \
static __noinline int name(struct st *s) \
{ \
if (!s) \
return bpf_get_prandom_u32(); \
return expr; \
}
OP(op_a, s->a + 2) OP(op_b, s->a + 3) OP(op_c, s->a + 4) OP(op_d, s->a + 5)
OP(op_e, s->a + 6) OP(op_f, s->a + 7) OP(op_g, s->a + 8) OP(op_h, s->a + 9)
static int (* const volatile ops[])(struct st *) = {
op_a, op_b, op_c, op_d, op_e, op_f, op_g, op_h
};
SEC("socket")
int vt_all(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
int i, sum = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
sum += ops[i](&g);
return sum;
}
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
The verifier knows that &g is not NULL, so every op starts with a nop.
bpf-next: Return value: 124
this series: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
RIP: 0010:0x0
That's the shape of any table of ops.
The minimal fix is to do the lookup before the install.
On top of the whole series:
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
index a442188647bc..de758ce7afac 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
@@ -451,6 +451,28 @@ int bpf_patch_list_commit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
}
}
+ /*
+ * Before the new image is installed and subprogs are removed:
+ * bpf_find_subprog() looks at prog->len and at the subprogs.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < env->func_ptr_cnt; i++) {
+ struct bpf_func_ptr *fp = &env->func_ptrs[i];
+ int subprog;
+
+ if (fp->xlated_off == BPF_FUNC_PTR_DELETED)
+ continue;
+ if (bpf_patch_image_deleted(&img, fp->xlated_off)) {
+ subprog = bpf_find_subprog(env, fp->xlated_off);
+ if (subprog <= 0 ||
+ img.new_off[env->subprog_info[subprog].start] ==
+ img.new_off[env->subprog_info[subprog + 1].start]) {
+ fp->xlated_off = BPF_FUNC_PTR_DELETED;
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+ fp->xlated_off = bpf_patch_image_remap(&img, img.new_off, fp->xlated_off);
+ }
+
bpf_patch_image_install(prog, &img);
for (i = 0, k = 0; i < img.cnt; i = end) {
@@ -474,25 +496,6 @@ int bpf_patch_list_commit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
env->insn_aux_data_len = img.new_cnt;
data = NULL;
- /* before subprogs are removed, since it looks at them */
- for (i = 0; i < env->func_ptr_cnt; i++) {
- struct bpf_func_ptr *fp = &env->func_ptrs[i];
- int subprog;
-
- if (fp->xlated_off == BPF_FUNC_PTR_DELETED)
- continue;
- if (bpf_patch_image_deleted(&img, fp->xlated_off)) {
- subprog = bpf_find_subprog(env, fp->xlated_off);
- if (subprog <= 0 ||
- img.new_off[env->subprog_info[subprog].start] ==
- img.new_off[env->subprog_info[subprog + 1].start]) {
- fp->xlated_off = BPF_FUNC_PTR_DELETED;
- continue;
- }
- }
- fp->xlated_off = bpf_patch_image_remap(&img, img.new_off, fp->xlated_off);
- }
-
if (img.del)
patch_list_del_subprogs(env, img.new_off);
With it the prog above returns 124.
But that fixes one instance.
The commit changes prog->len, aux data, func ptrs, subprogs, line info and
insn arrays one after another, and helpers read env and prog in between.
So the order of the steps is load-bearing, and nothing says so.
Make each table a function of (old value, new_off[]), with no helper that
looks at env or prog, and install the image as the last step.
Then this class of bugs cannot happen.
Please add a selftest for it: callx through a pointer in .rodata, the callee
starts with a nop, and main loses more insns than the callee has.
All tests in patches 21 and 22 pass on bpf-next without the series,
so they don't tell whether a remap rule of the commit is wrong.
Also patches 4 and 6 don't apply anymore, since arena_scalar is gone.
Other than that the patches look great.
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-31 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 11:51 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/22] bpf: Replace bpf_patch_insn_data() with a list of deferred patches Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/22] bpf: Add a list of deferred instruction patches Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/22] bpf: Remap the verifier state through the patch list Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 12:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/22] bpf: Apply single-instruction patches of the verifier in place Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/22] bpf: Queue the rewrites of bpf_do_misc_fixups() Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/22] bpf: Expand a backward may_goto to gotol when patches push it out of range Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 12:59 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/22] bpf: Drop the constant delta from bpf_do_misc_fixups() Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/22] bpf: Let the patch list remove instructions Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 12:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-31 5:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/22] bpf: Remove dead code through the patch list Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/22] bpf: Strip nops " Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 12:45 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/22] bpf: Batch the patches of bpf_opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32() Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/22] bpf: Allow patching an instruction twice through the patch list Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/22] bpf: Teach the patch list to insert in front of an instruction Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 12:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/22] bpf: Allow inserting in front of a queued patch Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/22] bpf: Move bpf_convert_ctx_accesses() to the patch list Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 12:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-30 11:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/22] bpf: Insert the may_goto counter setup through " Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 16/22] bpf: Append the hidden subprog " Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 17/22] bpf: Inline bpf_loop() calls " Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 18/22] bpf: Apply the patch list without a verifier env Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 19/22] bpf: Blind constants through the patch list Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 12:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-30 11:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 20/22] bpf: Remove the old instruction patching code Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 21/22] selftests/bpf: Test jumps around patches of bpf_do_misc_fixups() Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 11:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 22/22] selftests/bpf: Cover a backward may_goto pushed out of range by patches Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-30 12:13 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMIRYFU9YEX1.14HBEXD0UQR7H@gmail.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=odys.yuan@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.