From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "Shihuang Liu" <shlomojune6@gmail.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>, <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
<memxor@gmail.com>, <martin.lau@linux.dev>, <song@kernel.org>,
<yonghong.song@linux.dev>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
<emil@etsalapatis.com>, <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Check variable-offset accesses against special fields
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2026 16:11:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMPYM1AW7KEU.3RX07MQ1JMR39@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261108152941.7363-1-shlomojune6@gmail.com>
On Sun, Nov 08, 2026 at 07:29 AM Shihuang Liu <shlomojune6@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check every offset the register can take (min_off + k * step)
> against the record. Constant offsets keep the existing check.
No need for the helper and the second loop.
reg->step is never 0. ___mark_reg_known() sets it to 1 and
reg_bounds_sanity_check() reports 0 as a verifier bug.
So a constant offset is the k == 0 case of the same check.
Something like this (compile tested only):
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 8bf3909..2265362 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -8094,7 +8094,12 @@ int btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
for (i = 0; i < rec->cnt; i++) {
struct btf_field *field = &rec->fields[i];
u32 offset = field->offset;
- if (off < offset + field->size && offset < off + size) {
+ /* An access at 'lo' or above ends after the start of the field. */
+ s64 lo = max(min_off, (s64)offset - size + 1);
+
+ /* Round up to min_off + k * step. The step is never 0. */
+ lo += imod(min_off - lo, reg->step);
+ if (lo <= max_off && lo < offset + field->size) {
bpf_log(log,
"direct access to %s is disallowed\n",
btf_field_type_name(field->type));
The store to arr[i] from the commit log. It loads today. With the fix
the verifier says "direct access to kptr is disallowed".
clang can't emit such BTF. Compile the struct with p at offset 16.
After __open() move p to offset 8 in bpf_object__btf(), then load.
The store to arr[i].data from my reply to v1. It has to keep loading.
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-08 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-08 15:29 [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Check variable-offset accesses against special fields Shihuang Liu
2026-11-08 16:01 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-08 16:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2026-11-09 9:47 ` J4f J4f
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMPYM1AW7KEU.3RX07MQ1JMR39@gmail.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=shlomojune6@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.