From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA76487 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA82402 for linux-list; Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:20:08 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA36868 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:20:07 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mikehill@hgeng.com) Received: from calvin.tor.onramp.ca (calvin.tor.onramp.ca [204.225.88.15]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via SMTP id NAA00284 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:20:05 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mikehill@hgeng.com) Received: (qmail 15347 invoked from network); 17 Jun 1999 20:20:03 -0000 Received: from imail.hgeng.com (HELO bart.hgeng.com) (199.246.72.233) by mail.onramp.ca with SMTP; 17 Jun 1999 20:20:03 -0000 Received: by BART with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id ; Thu, 17 Jun 1999 16:22:15 -0400 Message-ID: From: Mike Hill To: "'Thomas Bogendoerfer'" , linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: RE: Booting an Indigo2 Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 16:22:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Bogendoerfer [SMTP:tsbogend@alpha.franken.de] > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 1999 3:23 PM > To: Mike Hill; linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com > Subject: Re: Booting an Indigo2 > > On Thu, Jun 17, 1999 at 02:39:40PM -0400, Mike Hill wrote: > > Sorry, this looks familiar. Here's what I get in my serial console: > > do you think so ? > I found similar messages in the list archive, one from Chad (on his Indy) and one from Andrew, but no specific conclusions. Thanks for the interpretation. Mike