From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Adrian Head Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] summary of what I need to do to mount snapshot on XFS References: <1010503449.28039.5.camel@cali.nesnahhouse.com> <20020115151621.E11005@sistina.com> In-Reply-To: <20020115151621.E11005@sistina.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Jan 15 09:10:02 2002 List-Id: To: linux-lvm@sistina.com, "Heinz J . Mauelshagen" On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:16, Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote: > > The lvm.c change you talk about I assume is the LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT > > change? For some reason when adding the lvm-1.0.1 upgrade patch this > > disappears from lvm.c I have been able to get this to compile with the > > change but I have forgoten what I did. > > > > This is one question I would like answered by the LVM gurus: should > > #define LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT still be there after upgrading to lvm-1.0.1? > > Yes. I have found that using the generated lvm-1.0.1 upgrade patch that the #define LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT gets removed. If all I do is add it back in manually - do I need to worry about other areas of the code that also need touch-ups? How would I tell? Thanks -- Adrian Head (Public Key available on request.)