All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerrit Huizenga <gh@us.ibm.com>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] 7.52 second kernel compile
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 22:42:19 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E16m7u7-0007yv-00@w-gerrit2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sat, 16 Mar 2002 17:15:35 +1100. <20020316061535.GA16653@krispykreme>


And this *without* the dcache_lock?  Hmm.  So you are saying there
may still be room for improvement?

BTW, are you doing this all out of cache/memory or do you have a
disk/controller quick enough to do the initial little file reads that
fast?

gerrit

In message <20020316061535.GA16653@krispykreme>, > : Anton Blanchard writes:
> 
> > Let the kernel compile benchmarks continue!
> 
> I think Im addicted. I need help!
> 
> In this update we added 8 cpus and rewrote the ppc64 pagetable management
> code to do lockless inserts and removals (there is still locking at
> the pte level to avoid races).
> 
> hardware: 32 way logical partition, 1.1GHz POWER4, 60G RAM
> 
> kernel: 2.5.7-pre1 + ppc64 pagetable rework
> 
> kernel compiled: 2.4.18 x86 with Martin's config
> 
> compiler: gcc 2.95.3 x86 cross compiler
> 
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/anton/intel_kernel/linux/arch/i386/boot'
> 128.89user 40.23system 0:07.52elapsed 2246%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (437084major+572835minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> 
> 7.52 seconds is not a bad result for something running under a hypervisor.
> The profile looks much better now. We still spend a lot of time flushing tlb
> entries but we can look into batching them.
> 
> Anton
> --
> anton@samba.org
> anton@au.ibm.com
> 
> 155912 total                                      0.0550
> 114562 .cpu_idle                               
> 
>  12615 .local_flush_tlb_range                  
>   8476 .local_flush_tlb_page                   
>   2576 .insert_hpte_into_group                 
> 
>   1980 .do_anonymous_page                      
>   1813 .lru_cache_add                          
>   1390 .d_lookup                               
>   1320 .__copy_tofrom_user                     
>   1140 .save_remaining_regs                    
>    612 .rmqueue                                
>    517 .atomic_dec_and_lock                    
>    492 .do_page_fault                          
>    444 .copy_page                              
>    438 .__free_pages_ok                        
>    375 .set_page_dirty                         
>    350 .zap_page_range                         
>    314 .schedule                               
>    270 .__find_get_page                        
>    245 .page_cache_release                     
>    233 .lru_cache_del                          
>    231 .hvc_poll                               
>    215 .sys_brk                                
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lse-tech mailing list
> Lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lse-tech

  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-16  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-13  8:52 10.31 second kernel compile Anton Blanchard
2002-03-13 14:44 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-03-13 21:44   ` [Lse-tech] " Dave Hansen
2002-03-14  1:07     ` Keith Owens
2002-03-14 11:27   ` Anton Blanchard
2002-03-14 13:16     ` [Lse-tech] " Dipankar Sarma
2002-03-17 13:12       ` some RCU dcache and ratcache results Anton Blanchard
2002-03-14 13:21     ` [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile Momchil Velikov
2002-03-14 18:33       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-03-15 12:16         ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-03-16  5:12           ` Anton Blanchard
2002-03-15 18:20         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-16 11:55           ` Paul Mackerras
2002-03-16 17:25             ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-16 17:57             ` yodaiken
2002-03-16 18:06             ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-16 18:35               ` yodaiken
2002-03-16 18:45                 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-16 18:57                   ` yodaiken
2002-03-16 19:16                     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-16 19:43                       ` David Mosberger
2002-03-16 19:58                         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-16 20:08                           ` yodaiken
2002-03-16 20:23                             ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-16 20:36                           ` David Mosberger
2002-03-16 20:46                             ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-17  1:09                               ` Paul Mackerras
2002-03-17  2:08                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-16 19:53                       ` yodaiken
2002-03-16 20:02                         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-16 20:25                           ` yodaiken
2002-03-27  1:07                       ` Richard Henderson
2002-03-16 20:53               ` Alan Cox
2002-03-18  3:07             ` David S. Miller
2002-03-16 15:24           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-03-16 19:01             ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-16 22:25               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-03-19 16:35                 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-03-14 19:05       ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-19 16:40         ` Bill Davidsen
2002-03-14 18:21     ` Hanna Linder
2002-03-16  5:27       ` Anton Blanchard
2002-03-15  7:12   ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-03-16  6:15 ` 7.52 " Anton Blanchard
2002-03-16  6:42   ` Gerrit Huizenga [this message]
2002-03-17 12:34     ` [Lse-tech] " Anton Blanchard
2002-03-17 22:09       ` Theodore Tso
2002-03-18  7:04         ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-19 18:28           ` Theodore Tso
2002-03-16  8:05   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-16 11:04     ` Paul Mackerras
2002-03-16 18:32       ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-17  2:00         ` Paul Mackerras
2002-03-17  2:40           ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-17  2:50             ` M. Edward Borasky
2002-03-18 15:08               ` 0.73 " snpe
2002-03-18 19:42           ` 7.52 " Cort Dougan
2002-03-18 20:04             ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-18 20:23               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-18 21:50                 ` Rene Herman
2002-03-18 22:36                 ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-18 22:47                   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-18 22:56                     ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-18 23:52                     ` Paul Mackerras
2002-03-19  0:57                       ` Dave Jones
2002-03-19  3:35                         ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-19  0:22                     ` David S. Miller
2002-03-19  0:27                       ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-19  0:27                         ` David S. Miller
2002-03-19  0:36                           ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-19  0:38                             ` David S. Miller
2002-03-19  1:28                               ` Davide Libenzi
2002-03-19  2:42                 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-03-27  2:53                 ` Richard Henderson
2002-04-02  4:32                   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-02 10:50                 ` Pablo Alcaraz
2002-03-18 21:34               ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-18 22:00                 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-18 19:37       ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-16 11:54     ` yodaiken
2002-03-16 17:37   ` [Lse-tech] " Martin J. Bligh
2002-03-16 18:57     ` Daniel Egger
2002-03-17  8:18       ` Mike Galbraith
2002-03-17 15:29         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-03-17  1:45     ` Keith Owens
2002-03-17 13:54     ` David Woodhouse
2002-03-19 16:49     ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E16m7u7-0007yv-00@w-gerrit2 \
    --to=gh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.