From: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
rml@tech9.net, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Johannes Erdfelt <johannes@erdfelt.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: 2.5.8-pre3: kernel BUG at usb.c:849! (preempt_count 1)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 00:20:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E16vQRn-0000DD-00@baldrick> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16vHsQ-0000Jy-00@baldrick> <E16vLJx-00028n-00@baldrick> <071e01c1e0b4$64f382e0$6800000a@brownell.org>
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 7:23 pm, David Brownell wrote:
> > > And what usb device driver(s) were supposed to have stopped
> > > using "device 3"? I've only noticed such device refcounting bugs
> > > being caused by the USB device drivers with bad disconnect()
> > > routines, not usbcore or any of the host controller drivers, but of
> > > course that can change.
> >
> > Ha!
> >
> > $ cat /proc/bus/usb/drivers
> > usbfs
> > hub
> >
> > There are no other drivers! I have a USB webcam and a modem
> > ... has a user space driver that works via usbfs.
>
> ... OK, this is sounding familiar. "usbfs" has some recently noted
> bugs in its disconnect() routine. That SpeedTouch driver seems to
> be triggering them with regularity, though more often with usb-ohci.
>
> The ksymoops info you sent is compatible with the bug being in
> the usbfs code: exactly what I'd expect such a BUG() to show.
>
> I hate to send around untested patches, but I think the one I've
> attached is at least in the right direction. (Attachment, to avoid
> mangling by mailers...) It's an update of what I sent around late
> last month to address someone's SpeedTouch oopsing with
> usb-ohci (!) on 2.4.19-pre2, redone against 2.5.8-pre3, which
> compiles. I hope it doesn't create new oopses.
>
> If it works for you, let us know ...
>
> - Dave
It seems to work - thanks! I will test more, but so far so good.
System shutdown still completes with "preempt_count = 1"
though.
All the best,
Duncan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-10 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-10 13:11 2.5.8-pre3: kernel BUG at usb.c:849! (preempt_count 1) Duncan Sands
2002-04-10 15:41 ` Johannes Erdfelt
2002-04-10 16:40 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2002-04-10 16:51 ` Duncan Sands
2002-04-10 17:23 ` David Brownell
2002-04-10 22:20 ` Duncan Sands [this message]
2002-04-10 17:00 ` Robert Love
2002-04-10 17:11 ` Duncan Sands
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E16vQRn-0000DD-00@baldrick \
--to=duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=johannes@erdfelt.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.