From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, torvalds@transmeta.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] start_aggressive_readahead
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 08:53:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E17Xyyf-0006Al-00@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020725181059.A25857@lst.de>
On Thursday 25 July 2002 18:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I'm also open for a better name (I think the current one is very bad,
> but don't have a better idea :)). I'd also be ineterested in comments
> how to avoid the new function and use existing functionality for it,
> but I've tried to find it for a long time and didn't find something
> suiteable.
That's the right attitude imho. Redoing reahead needs to be a project
all by itself, a fine thing to experiment with in the stable series.
A bad idea that sort of works for now is better than what we've got.
--
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-26 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-25 16:10 [RFC] start_aggressive_readahead Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-25 16:44 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-25 19:40 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-26 16:50 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-26 19:38 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-28 23:32 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-29 0:19 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-29 2:12 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-29 3:05 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-29 15:24 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-29 7:34 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-29 7:37 ` Vladimir Dergachev
2002-07-29 7:53 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-29 8:04 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-30 16:11 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-30 16:21 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-07-30 16:38 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-30 16:52 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-05 18:54 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-30 17:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-26 20:14 ` Stephen Lord
2002-07-26 20:29 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-26 6:53 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E17Xyyf-0006Al-00@starship \
--to=phillips@arcor.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.