From: NeilBrown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] 1 of 2 - When a partition is claimed, claim the whole device for partitioning.
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:35:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E19m2XN-0002BP-00@notabene> (raw)
### Comments for ChangeSet
Current devices can be 'claimed' by filesystems (when mounting) or
md/raid (when being included in an array) or 'raw' or ....
This stop concurrent access by these systems.
However it is still possible for one system to claim the whole device
and a second system to claim one partition, which is not good.
With this patch, when a partition is claimed, the whole device is
claimed for partitioning. So you cannot have a partition and the
whole devices claimed at the same time (except if the whole device
is claimed for partitioning).
----------- Diffstat output ------------
./fs/block_dev.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff ./fs/block_dev.c~current~ ./fs/block_dev.c
--- ./fs/block_dev.c~current~ 2003-08-11 09:01:38.000000000 +1000
+++ ./fs/block_dev.c 2003-08-11 09:01:38.000000000 +1000
@@ -419,12 +419,34 @@ void bd_forget(struct inode *inode)
int bd_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder)
{
- int res = -EBUSY;
+ int res;
spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
- if (!bdev->bd_holder || bdev->bd_holder == holder) {
- bdev->bd_holder = holder;
+
+ /* first decide result */
+ if (bdev->bd_holder == holder)
+ res = 0; /* already a holder */
+ else if (bdev->bd_holder != NULL)
+ res = -EBUSY; /* held by someone else */
+ else if (bdev->bd_contains == bdev)
+ res = 0; /* is a whole device which isn't held */
+
+ else if (bdev->bd_contains->bd_holder == bd_claim)
+ res = 0; /* is a partition of a device that is being partitioned */
+ else if (bdev->bd_contains->bd_holder != NULL)
+ res = -EBUSY; /* is a partition of a held device */
+ else
+ res = 0; /* is a partition of an un-held device */
+
+ /* now impose change */
+ if (res==0) {
+ /* note that for a whole device bd_holders
+ * will be incremented twice, and bd_holder will
+ * be set to bd_claim before being set to holder
+ */
+ bdev->bd_contains->bd_holders ++;
+ bdev->bd_contains->bd_holder = bd_claim;
bdev->bd_holders++;
- res = 0;
+ bdev->bd_holder = holder;
}
spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
return res;
@@ -433,6 +455,8 @@ int bd_claim(struct block_device *bdev,
void bd_release(struct block_device *bdev)
{
spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
+ if (!--bdev->bd_contains->bd_holders)
+ bdev->bd_contains->bd_holder = NULL;
if (!--bdev->bd_holders)
bdev->bd_holder = NULL;
spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
next reply other threads:[~2003-08-11 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-11 2:35 NeilBrown [this message]
2003-08-11 7:23 ` [PATCH] 1 of 2 - When a partition is claimed, claim the whole device for partitioning Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E19m2XN-0002BP-00@notabene \
--to=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.