All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Natalia Portillo" <claunia@claunia.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [Qemu-devel] Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virtual PC
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 21:07:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Bj1gZ-0002G6-GF@lists.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7431CE2A-D1DF-11D8-A23B-000A2796D230@free.fr>

I think that including support for the PowerPC swapping instructions in QEMU
will break compatibility with host PowerPCs before G3, so that instructions
should be used in a run-time capability detection scheme. 

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: qemu-devel-bounces+iosglpgc=teleline.es@nongnu.org 
> [mailto:qemu-devel-bounces+iosglpgc=teleline.es@nongnu.org] 
> En nombre de Pierre d'Herbemont
> Enviado el: viernes, 09 de julio de 2004 20:38
> Para: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Asunto: Re: [Qemu-devel] Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, 
> QEMU vs Virtual PC
> 
> I probably should add that the Mac OS X version that is 
> avalaible for download doesn't include support for the 
> PowerPC swapping instructions (little-endian storing and 
> loading instructions). Next release will.
> 
> Pierre
> 
> Le 6 juil. 04, à 02:29, dguinan@mac.com a écrit :
> 
> > It was precisely because it has not yet been optimized that I was 
> > curious of first impressions.  The fact that it has been 
> described as 
> > "somewhat" slower is encouraging.  No one expects it to be 
> faster than 
> > VPC out the gate, but to be in the same ballpark is quite an 
> > achievement.
> >
> > -Daniel
> >
> >
> > On Jul 5, 2004, at 5:23 PM, Leigh Dyer wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 15:24 -0700, Daniel J.Guinan wrote:
> >>> I'm curious, how does the speed compare to Virtual PC?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Not terribly well yet - on my 1Ghz Tibook, it feels about the same 
> >> speed as on my 800Mhz PIII desktop PC at work, which is to 
> say that 
> >> the emulated system seems somewhere around 
> >> high-end-468/low-end-Pentium speed. However, it's important to 
> >> remember that Virtual PC:
> >>
> >> * has been around for ages, and has seen lots of development and 
> >> optimisation
> >> * uses a hand-written and heavily optimised x86->PPC translator
> >> * uses special PPC features like Altivec and little-endian mode to 
> >> speed things up
> >> * uses the host system's MMU to accelerate memory access
> >>
> >> Qemu's still fast enough to be usable for a great many 
> things though, 
> >> so if you're debating whether or not to try it, by all 
> means download 
> >> it and give it a go.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Leigh
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Qemu-devel mailing list
> >> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qemu-devel mailing list
> > Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-09 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-02 22:56 [Qemu-devel] [Patch] Mac OS X Port Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-03 13:34 ` Jean-Michel POURE
2004-07-04  7:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Christian Walther
2004-07-04 10:08   ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-04 10:37     ` Leigh Dyer
2004-07-05  1:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Leigh Dyer
2004-07-05 22:24   ` [Qemu-devel] Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virtual PC Daniel J. Guinan
2004-07-06  0:23     ` Leigh Dyer
2004-07-06  0:29       ` dguinan
2004-07-09 19:37         ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-09 20:07           ` Natalia Portillo [this message]
2004-07-09 20:14             ` Chad Page
2004-07-10 12:47             ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-10 13:08               ` J. Mayer
2004-07-10 13:23                 ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-10 14:05                   ` J. Mayer
2004-08-12 10:56                 ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12 12:51                   ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-10 13:14           ` Fabrice Bellard
2004-07-10 13:27             ` Pierre d'Herbemont

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1Bj1gZ-0002G6-GF@lists.gnu.org \
    --to=claunia@claunia.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.