All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Natalia Portillo" <claunia@claunia.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [Qemu-devel] BIOS behaves different as real BIOS
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 09:20:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1BlkSU-0005xU-Ly@lists.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1090048364.21480.6.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com>

Well the PC-DOS 1.0 does not have that signature, and also does not create
it in any disk you format. Nor the SCO Xenix has it.

I know this signature is present on DOS 3.0 and upper versions in all disks
you create. I not know about DOS 2.0 (I lost my copy of this version).

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: qemu-devel-bounces+iosglpgc=teleline.es@nongnu.org
> [mailto:qemu-devel-bounces+iosglpgc=teleline.es@nongnu.org]
> En nombre de Antony T Curtis
> Enviado el: sábado, 17 de julio de 2004 8:13
> Para: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Asunto: Re: [Qemu-devel] BIOS behaves different as real BIOS
> 
> On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 07:01, Natalia Portillo wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I tried to boot an old operating system from qemu and I get
> a message
> > from BIOS saying that tbe floppy is not bootable
> (literally: "FATAL: 
> > Not a bootable disk").
> > 
> > I think that this is because the BIOS searches for the 0x55AA 
> > signature on last two bytes of first sector of disk.
> > As far as I remember, this signature was introduced very
> lately and as
> > far as I tested on my real systems, this signature is not really 
> > searched at boot time, and every DOS before 3.0 doesn't
> have it (it is
> > used also by later DOSes and Windows to identify a FAT
> filesystem), at
> > least on floppies (I think that on hard disks it is also
> ignored, but
> > never tested -0x55AA is also used to identify Intel
> partition scheme, aka MBR-).
> 
> I remember looking at the IBM PC/XT BIOS source and seeing it, and 
> when I used to play with putting my own messages in the boot sector, 
> It had to be there. This was around 15 years ago. The old IBM PC/XT 
> would boot into ROM Cassette BASIC if it did not find the signature. 
> It is possible that the original IBM PC did not have the check but by 
> the time the PC/XT came out, it did. The model of the PC/XT I had was 
> 5150 (the 2 full height floppy drive model)
> 
> <snip>
> 
> --
> Antony T Curtis <antony.t.curtis@ntlworld.com>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2004-07-17  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-17  6:01 [Qemu-devel] BIOS behaves different as real BIOS Natalia Portillo
2004-07-17  6:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Ben Pfaff
2004-07-17  6:45   ` Natalia Portillo
2004-07-17  6:51     ` Ben Pfaff
2004-07-17  7:04       ` Natalia Portillo
2004-07-17 15:47         ` Ben Pfaff
2004-07-17  7:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Antony T Curtis
2004-07-17  8:20   ` Natalia Portillo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1BlkSU-0005xU-Ly@lists.gnu.org \
    --to=claunia@claunia.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.