RE: [uml-devel] Compiling UML 2.6.8.1 with Static Linking results in segfault

["Michael Ralston" <ralston@stral.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1660 bytes --]

Hey, the core is 20k gzipped :)

Michael 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Ralston [mailto:ralston@stral.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 September 2004 9:58 AM
> To: 'user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Cc: 'Jeff Dike'
> Subject: RE: [uml-devel] Compiling UML 2.6.8.1 with Static 
> Linking results in segfault 
> 
> The core is 483k, want me to email that just to you (not the 
> list), or is the gdb output below pretty conclusive?
> 
> I'm running this on a 2.6.8.1 host with SKAS3-2.6.7-v1 patch, 
> and as I said libc6-2.3.2, so it's prolly another one of 
> those lovely NPTL/TLS issues.
> 
> The Config options which are set:
> # CONFIG_MODE_TT is not set
> CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y
> CONFIG_MODE_SKAS=y 
> 
> If I disable STATIC_LINK then it runs fine...
> 
> 
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /uml/linux
> 
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x08191800 in __libc_setup_tls () at swab.h:134
> 134     swab.h: No such file or directory.
>         in swab.h
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Dike [mailto:jdike@addtoit.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 September 2004 10:18 AM
> > To: ralston@stral.net
> > Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Compiling UML 2.6.8.1 with Static Linking 
> > results in segfault
> > 
> > ralston@stral.net said:
> > > Can I provide any further info or is this a known problem? 
> > 
> > Get a core, and get a stack trace from it?
> > 
> > 				Jeff
> > 
> > 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.752 / Virus Database: 503 - Release Date: 3/09/2004
 
  

[-- Attachment #2: core.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 20991 bytes --]