All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid sync observations
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:02:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Ep7MF-0000uF-Fj@highlab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051221114912.GY10278@strugglers.net>

Andy Smith <andy@lug.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:55:47PM +1100, Christopher Smith wrote:
> > Why would you use RAID6 and not RAID10 with four disks ?
> 
> I was wondering the same thing.  It's true that RAID6 is guaranteed
> to still run degraded after losing 2 devices, whereas a RAID10 on 4
> devices could only lose 1 device from each RAID1.  So there is some
> small extra redundancy there.

That's the reason - better reliability.  With 4-disk RAID-10, a 2-disk
failure has a 1/3 chance of causing array failure.  With RAID-6, there
is no chance.


> But how does the performance for read and write compare?

Good question!  I'll post some performance numbers of the RAID-6
configuration when I have it up and running.


-- 
Sebastian Kuzminsky

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-21 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-20 17:18 Raid sync observations Sebastian Kuzminsky
2005-12-20 18:14 ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2005-12-20 21:27 ` Neil Brown
2005-12-20 21:33   ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2005-12-21  1:55 ` Christopher Smith
2005-12-21 11:49   ` Andy Smith
2005-12-21 17:02     ` Sebastian Kuzminsky [this message]
2005-12-21 17:13       ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-08 18:18         ` Bill Davidsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-20 18:27 Andrew Burgess
2005-12-20 19:13 ` Sebastian Kuzminsky
2005-12-20 22:09 Jeff Breidenbach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1Ep7MF-0000uF-Fj@highlab.com \
    --to=seb@highlab.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.