From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from jdl.com (jdl.com [66.118.10.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C20E67C19 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 23:50:58 +1000 (EST) To: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10 v2] Document I2C_MPC option for 86xx too. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 09 Jun 2006 09:37:37 +0200." <20060609093737.f66d5a41.khali@linux-fr.org> References: <1149804296.23938.298.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com> <20060609093737.f66d5a41.khali@linux-fr.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 08:50:34 -0500 From: Jon Loeliger Message-Id: Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , So, like, the other day Jean Delvare mumbled: > Hi Jon, > > Please add a paragraph explaining what the patch does. It will be used > as the git commit message. Hi Jean, There is a one-line commit message that will come from the Subject: line. If I add a paragraph, it will be "Document I2C_MPC option for 86xx too." which will end up as a duplicate line in the commit message. Thanks, jdl