From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from jdl.com (jdl.com [208.123.74.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCFDDDDFC for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:08:31 +1000 (EST) To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Kernel: Move all technical descriptons of the Device Tree Complier In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:42:22 +1000." <18069.41758.420516.135000@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <1184190359.25384.129.camel@ld0161-tx32> <18069.41758.420516.135000@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:08:25 -0500 From: Jon Loeliger Message-Id: Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , So, like, the other day Paul Mackerras mumbled: > Jon Loeliger writes: > > > and its formats, command lines, descriptions, etc, > > over to the Device Tree Compiler repositories now. > > Hrm, section II (DT block format) is a description of a kernel > interface, and I think it should stay. After all, there's nothing Hmm. That's a good point; I'll buy it. All of section II, then? > I have no problem with that section being copied over to the dtc > source. > > I also don't mind section IV being removed, although a sentence saying > that dtc is useful for generating dtbs, and where to find dtc, would > be useful. I will respin the patch as suggested! jdl