Re: [PATCH] Add StorCenter DTS first draft.

[Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>]

So, like, the other day Segher Boessenkool mumbled:
> > +/ {
> > +	model = "StorCenter";
> 
> If you can find a real model number, put it in here, instead.

Yep, "StorCenter" is it.  No model numer/name beyond that.

> > +	compatible = "storcenter";
> 
> Needs a manufacturer name in there.

Right.  Will use:
	compatible = "iomega,storcenter"

> > +		PowerPC,603e {			/* Really 8241 */
> 
> So say "PowerPC,8241@0", or "PowerPC,e300@0" (or whatever
> the CPU core in there is), or simply "cpu@0", following
> the generic naming recommended practice.

Well, its the 8241 SoC with a 603e core...  (This is
the same phrase currently being used on the Kurobox.)
I'll use:

	PowerPC,8241@0 }


> > +			bus-frequency = <0>;
> 
> Is this filled in anywhere?  Please document that, if so.

Right.  boot{loader,wrapper}

> > +	soc10x {
> 
> Bad name.  Where is the binding for this?  I don't think
> I saw it before.

It's what is being used, again, by the Kurobox.  I understand
that doesn't make it "right", just precedented by now.

How about "soc8241@80000000" instead?

That would be similar to:
        soc8641@f8000000 {
and
       soc8272@f0000000 {

> > +		store-gathering = <0>; /* 0 == off, !0 == on */
> 
> Don't define this as "!0", but as "1".

OK.

> > +		i2c@fdf03000 {
> > +			device_type = "i2c";
> 
> No device_type, there is no I2C binding.

Right.

> > +			compatible = "fsl-i2c";
> 
> Needs to be more specific.

Hmmm...  Not sure what to use here then.  There are many
existing examples using "fsl-i2c" already.  Granted, we've
established that they could be wrong...  Should this be
more like this?:

    compatible = "fsl,mpc8241-i2c", "fsl-i2c";

> > +		mpic: pic@fdf40000 {
> 
> interrupt-controller@fdf40000

OK.

> > +		pci@fe800000 {
> > +			clock-frequency = <d# 100000000>; /* Hz */
> 
> 100MHz PCI?  Interesting.

Good point. 66666666 seems more likely...


Thanks for the review and help here!

jdl