From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from jdl.com (jdl.com [208.123.74.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84A6DDEC8 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 08:56:56 +1000 (EST) To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add StorCenter DTS first draft. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:34:05 CDT." <469D43DD.8020102@freescale.com> References: <630B6BC9-389F-4F5C-AE8F-9C3131C4543E@kernel.crashing.org> <469D43DD.8020102@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:56:51 -0500 From: Jon Loeliger Message-Id: Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , So, like, the other day Scott Wood mumbled: > Jon Loeliger wrote: > > How about "soc8241@80000000" instead? > > How about just "soc@80000000"? Those model numbers in the names are a > PITA to find from limited functionality environments such as the > bootwrapper, require things like stdout-path to be different on every > soc, and don't comply with the generic names recommendation. Oh! Right. No problem. jdl