Re: standard for documenting conditional preprocessor directives?

[Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>]

* Tue, 4 Sep 2007 11:19:29 -0700
* Organization: YPO4
>
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Oleg Verych wrote:
>
>> * 27-08-2007
>> 
>> Randy,
>> 
>> []
>> > Your example almost matches my preference/style, but there is no Linux
>> > kernel "standard" for this AFAIK.

{1}

>> 
>> i've proposed all this some time ago, in order to simplify scripts, that
>> strip __KERNEL__ in headers, and get rid of `unifdef`. I'm sure you've
>> saw that in LKML. But you, as well known documentation supporter, didn't
>> wrote proposition in English. Now you are saying "no standard". Who other
>> than you can propose it?
>
> Anyone can.  I just don't see a need for this particular one.

IMHO you should say so at first turn in {1}. Never mind, then.

>> []
>> > ---
>> > ~Randy
>> > *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
>> ____
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
>> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> 
>> Argh!!..
>
>
> What?  any why does your email interface not use or support
> reply-to-all?

Sorry, i'm getting more and more used to reply to group, not to
mailing list. Kind of not-silly, network friendly, clean

"do not ever CC me, i'm reading what i need, when i have time."

> ---
> ~Randy
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
-o--=O`C
 #oo'L O
<___=E M