From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jdl@jdl.com>
Received: from jdl.com (jdl.com [208.123.74.7])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EAFDDE9F
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Fri,  4 Jan 2008 01:53:22 +1100 (EST)
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [DTC] small ftdump cleanup patch 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:40:57 EST."
	<20080103144056.GB28644@windriver.com>
References: <20080103144056.GB28644@windriver.com> 
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 08:53:17 -0600
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
Message-Id: <E1JARRd-0005ED-Qr@jdl.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

So, like, the other day Paul Gortmaker mumbled:
> Here is a small patch to clean up the usage info and the error returns
> for ftdump -- not sure what the future holds for ftdump vs. simply using
> "dtc -I dtb -O dts someblob.dtb" ...
> 
> Paul.

Paul,

Any chance of a signed-off-by line?

Thanks,
jdl