All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl-CYoMK+44s/E@public.gmane.org>
To: David Gibson <david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: dtc: Allow multiple labels on nodes and properties (v2)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:57:05 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1NkIfh-0005pc-R0@jdl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100224072217.GJ7187@yookeroo>

> Oops, don't apply that one, it has an uninitialized variable bug.
> Here's a fixed version.
> 
> dtc: Allow multiple labels on nodes and properties
> 
> At present, both the grammar and our internal data structures mean
> that there can be only one label on a node or property.  This is a
> fairly arbitrary constraint, given that any number of value labels can
> appear at the same point, and that in C you can have any number of
> labels on the same statement.
> 
> This is pretty much a non-issue now, but it may become important with
> some of the extensions that Grant and I have in mind.  It's not that
> hard to change, so this patch does so, allowing an arbitrary number of
> labels on any given node or property.  As usual a testcase is added
> too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Index: dtc/tests/multilabel.dts
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null	1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ dtc/tests/multilabel.dts	2010-02-24 17:57:12.736958851 +1100
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@


So, I applied this.  But I had to make an extra amend step to
fix three things after applying it:

    - Remove the meta-comment, (placed after triple dash line)
    - Remove the extraneous "(v2)", (placed in Subject brackets)
    - Remove the duplicate Subject: line, (not repeated in body)

If instead the patch were formatted thusly, it would all just work:

    To: David Gibson <david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org>
    cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
    Subject: [PATCH v2] dtc: Allow multiple labels on nodes and properties

    At present, both the grammar and our internal data structures mean
    that there can be only one label on a node or property.  This is a
    fairly arbitrary constraint, given that any number of value labels can
    appear at the same point, and that in C you can have any number of
    labels on the same statement.
    
    This is pretty much a non-issue now, but it may become important with
    some of the extensions that Grant and I have in mind.  It's not that
    hard to change, so this patch does so, allowing an arbitrary number of
    labels on any given node or property.  As usual a testcase is added
    too.
    
    Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org>

    ---

    Oops, don't apply that one, it has an uninitialized variable bug.
    Here's a fixed version.
   
    Index: dtc/tests/multilabel.dts
    ===================================================================
    --- /dev/null	1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
    +++ dtc/tests/multilabel.dts	2010-02-24 17:57:12.736958851 +1100
    @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@

Thanks,
jdl

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-24 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-24  1:03 dtc: Allow multiple labels on nodes and properties David Gibson
2010-02-24  2:10 ` Grant Likely
2010-02-24  7:22 ` dtc: Allow multiple labels on nodes and properties (v2) David Gibson
2010-02-24 14:57   ` Jon Loeliger [this message]
     [not found]     ` <E1NkIfh-0005pc-R0-CYoMK+44s/E@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-24 21:58       ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1NkIfh-0005pc-R0@jdl.com \
    --to=jdl-cyomk+44s/e@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.