All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "SourceForge.net" <noreply@sourceforge.net>
To: noreply@sourceforge.net
Subject: [ kvm-Bugs-2988248 ] Windows XP x64 cannot use more than 2 cores
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:46:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1O2jzk-0006B5-SX@sfs-web-6.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com> (raw)

Bugs item #2988248, was opened at 2010-04-16 15:46
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by ruclen
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=2988248&group_id=180599

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Arseny Klimovsky (ruclen)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Windows XP x64 cannot use more than 2 cores

Initial Comment:
I'm using Ubuntu 9.10 with kernel 
2.6.31-20-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 12 04:38:19 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Processor
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU         975  @ 3.33GHz
4 cores, HyperThreading enabled, so in host linux I see 8 CPUs.
QEMU-KVM version:
qemu-kvm-0.11.0
I'm running guest Windows XP Pro x64 SP2
KVM command:
/usr/bin/kvm -S -M pc-0.11 -m 2048 -smp 8 -name virtual1 -uuid *** -monitor unix:/var/run/libvirt/qemu/virtual1.monitor,server,nowait -localtime -boot c -drive file=,if=ide,media=cdrom,index=0 -drive file=,if=ide,media=cdrom,index=2 -drive file=***/virtual1.img,if=virtio,index=0,boot=on -net nic,macaddr=***,vlan=0,model=virtio,name=virtio.0 -net tap,fd=17,vlan=0,name=tap.0 -serial pty -parallel none -usb -usbdevice tablet -vnc 127.0.0.1:0 -k en-us -vga cirrus

Inside the VM in device manager I see 8 CPUs, but actually everything else make me think that only 2 cores are used:
1. In task manager I see 2 graphs for CPU load
2. One core application has 50% cpu load.
3. In host machine htop shows only 2 cores are loaded (when multiple heavy-load processes are run in VM).

If I use "-smp 4" instead of "-smp 8", the behavior is the same.
So, why I see such behavior?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=2988248&group_id=180599

             reply	other threads:[~2010-04-16 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-16 11:46 SourceForge.net [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-16 12:10 [ kvm-Bugs-2988248 ] Windows XP x64 cannot use more than 2 cores SourceForge.net
2010-04-16 17:56 SourceForge.net
2010-04-16 18:52 SourceForge.net

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1O2jzk-0006B5-SX@sfs-web-6.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com \
    --to=noreply@sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.