From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Loeliger Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Allow nodes to be refrenced by path at the top level. Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:33:26 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20101102225243.1707.23433.stgit@riker> <20101102225504.1707.88754.stgit@riker> <20101104001557.GB5061@yookeroo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20101104001557.GB5061@yookeroo> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: David Gibson Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, glikely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 03:55:04PM -0700, John Bonesio wrote: > > When nodes are modified by merging device trees, nodes to be updated/merged > can > > be specified by a label. Specifying nodes by full path (instead of label) > > doesn't quite work. This patch fixes that. > > > > Signed-off-by: John Bonesio > > Acked-by: David Gibson > > If we go where I'm beginning to suspect we want to with deprecating > some existing syntax, this may become moot. However as long as we're > using reference like syntax for the merging, we should accept all the > references that are valid elsewhere. Are we read for just this patch, or the series? I didn't see any more commentary about the remaining 3 patches. Thanks, jdl