From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Loeliger Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Allow nodes to be refrenced by path at the top level. Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:49:51 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20101102225243.1707.23433.stgit@riker> <20101102225504.1707.88754.stgit@riker> <20101104001557.GB5061@yookeroo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Grant Likely Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Jon Loeliger wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 03:55:04PM -0700, John Bonesio wrote: > >> > When nodes are modified by merging device trees, nodes to be updated/m= > erged > >> =A0can > >> > be specified by a label. Specifying nodes by full path (instead of lab= > el) > >> > doesn't quite work. This patch fixes that. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: John Bonesio > >> > >> Acked-by: David Gibson > >> > >> If we go where I'm beginning to suspect we want to with deprecating > >> some existing syntax, this may become moot. =A0However as long as we're > >> using reference like syntax for the merging, we should accept all the > >> references that are valid elsewhere. > > > > Are we read for just this patch, or the series? > > I didn't see any more commentary about the remaining 3 patches. > > Hold off on the remaining three. Also, this patch is based on the > commits currently in my tree which have also been acked: > > git://git.secretlab.ca/git/dtc.git master > > g. Patch 1/4 in this series applied and pushed out along with Patch 1/4 from the previous series: Create new and use new print_error that uses printf style formatting. Thanks, jdl