From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from jdl.com (jdl.com [208.123.74.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED3E8B7191 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 03:25:32 +1100 (EST) To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] scripts: dtc: Merge in changes from the dtc repository In-reply-to: <20101117045935.GA12084@angua.secretlab.ca> References: <20101116204917.12146.39851.stgit@riker> <20101116204951.12146.21084.stgit@riker> <20101117045935.GA12084@angua.secretlab.ca> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:47:55 -0600 From: Jon Loeliger Message-Id: Cc: glikely@secretlab.ca, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Bonesio , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:49:51PM -0800, John Bonesio wrote: > > Pull in recent changes from the main dtc repository. These changes primarily > > allow multiple device trees to be declared which are merged by dtc. This > > feature allows us to include a basic dts file and then provide more informatio > n > > for the specific system through the merging functionality. > > > > Signed-off-by: John Bonesio > > Jon & David, I'll need your input on whether or not this is the best > way to handle updating the dtc copy in the kernel tree. > > g. Grant, Yeah, I wondered too. :-) David added it and updated in the kernel last round, so he may have some good notion of what would be best there. jdl From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934937Ab0KQQZc (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:25:32 -0500 Received: from jdl.com ([208.123.74.7]:48533 "EHLO jdl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758210Ab0KQQZb (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:25:31 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 2250 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:25:30 EST To: Grant Likely cc: John Bonesio , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, glikely@secretlab.ca, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] scripts: dtc: Merge in changes from the dtc repository In-reply-to: <20101117045935.GA12084@angua.secretlab.ca> References: <20101116204917.12146.39851.stgit@riker> <20101116204951.12146.21084.stgit@riker> <20101117045935.GA12084@angua.secretlab.ca> Comments: In-reply-to Grant Likely message dated "Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:59:35 -0700." Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:47:55 -0600 From: Jon Loeliger Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -1.8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:49:51PM -0800, John Bonesio wrote: > > Pull in recent changes from the main dtc repository. These changes primarily > > allow multiple device trees to be declared which are merged by dtc. This > > feature allows us to include a basic dts file and then provide more informatio > n > > for the specific system through the merging functionality. > > > > Signed-off-by: John Bonesio > > Jon & David, I'll need your input on whether or not this is the best > way to handle updating the dtc copy in the kernel tree. > > g. Grant, Yeah, I wondered too. :-) David added it and updated in the kernel last round, so he may have some good notion of what would be best there. jdl From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Loeliger Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] scripts: dtc: Merge in changes from the dtc repository Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:47:55 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20101116204917.12146.39851.stgit@riker> <20101116204951.12146.21084.stgit@riker> <20101117045935.GA12084@angua.secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20101117045935.GA12084-MrY2KI0G/OVr83L8+7iqerDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Grant Likely Cc: glikely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:49:51PM -0800, John Bonesio wrote: > > Pull in recent changes from the main dtc repository. These changes primarily > > allow multiple device trees to be declared which are merged by dtc. This > > feature allows us to include a basic dts file and then provide more informatio > n > > for the specific system through the merging functionality. > > > > Signed-off-by: John Bonesio > > Jon & David, I'll need your input on whether or not this is the best > way to handle updating the dtc copy in the kernel tree. > > g. Grant, Yeah, I wondered too. :-) David added it and updated in the kernel last round, so he may have some good notion of what would be best there. jdl