From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jdl@jdl.com (Jon Loeliger) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:53:33 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fix segfault in DTC In-Reply-To: <5065D9C7.40906@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1348526885-2113-1-git-send-email-mmayer@broadcom.com> <1348595889-6495-1-git-send-email-mmayer@broadcom.com> <1348595889-6495-2-git-send-email-mmayer@broadcom.com> <20120925233054.GL9800@truffula.fritz.box> <50624393.30607@broadcom.com> <20120926003508.GB31993@truffula.fritz.box> <50632F78.4030709@broadcom.com> <5065D9C7.40906@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > > > Yeah, seems like the kernel DTC is quite old. > > FYI, I'm working on a patch to the kernel to bring in the latest dtc. Awesome. Thank you. > I've run a regression test vs. the old dtc in the kernel ... Which is the icky step. Again, thank you. > ... and found that > some of the PowerPC .dts files don't compile with the new dtc (but did > with the old), all due to non-existent labels/paths being referenced. > I'll try and track down whether this is a regression in dtc, or simply > buggy .dts files that weren't noticed before. I think you should just smack the PowerPC guys. :-) > Everything non-PowerPC works fine, and most PowerPC files work fine. > Where compilation succeeds, the md5sum of the .dtb is identical in every > case. Cool. Thanks, jdl From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Loeliger Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix segfault in DTC Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:53:33 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1348526885-2113-1-git-send-email-mmayer@broadcom.com> <1348595889-6495-1-git-send-email-mmayer@broadcom.com> <1348595889-6495-2-git-send-email-mmayer@broadcom.com> <20120925233054.GL9800@truffula.fritz.box> <50624393.30607@broadcom.com> <20120926003508.GB31993@truffula.fritz.box> <50632F78.4030709@broadcom.com> <5065D9C7.40906@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <5065D9C7.40906-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Stephen Warren Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > > > > Yeah, seems like the kernel DTC is quite old. > > FYI, I'm working on a patch to the kernel to bring in the latest dtc. Awesome. Thank you. > I've run a regression test vs. the old dtc in the kernel ... Which is the icky step. Again, thank you. > ... and found that > some of the PowerPC .dts files don't compile with the new dtc (but did > with the old), all due to non-existent labels/paths being referenced. > I'll try and track down whether this is a regression in dtc, or simply > buggy .dts files that weren't noticed before. I think you should just smack the PowerPC guys. :-) > Everything non-PowerPC works fine, and most PowerPC files work fine. > Where compilation succeeds, the md5sum of the .dtb is identical in every > case. Cool. Thanks, jdl