From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Akio Takebe Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH]: kexec: framework and i386 (Take VIII) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 20:03:34 +0900 Message-ID: References: <20060509091849.GA18206@verge.net.au> <3c347db5fc144e0809c47b5efe8f6582@cl.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3c347db5fc144e0809c47b5efe8f6582@cl.cam.ac.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: Ian Pratt , Kazuo Moriwaka , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Akio Takebe , Isaku Yamahata , Magnus Damm , Horms , Mark Williamson List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi, No, it can kexec only to kdump kernel. I think we need to update kexec-tools for kexecing Xen. (e.g. to load xen,dom0 and initrd) Am I right, Horms? But this feature is good as coredump feature. Even if cannot kexec to Xen, I believe this is important feature. Best Regards, Akio Takebe > >On 16 May 2006, at 11:43, Akio Takebe wrote: > >> I tried Horms's kexec patch and Kazuo's tools. >> And I could get coredump of dom0! >> By using this feature, we can debug dom0 with gdbserver-xen >> to the same way as domU. >> I think that this is very useful. >> Xen don't have dump feature yet, >> and this feature don't affect performace, stability, and so on. >> We think this feature is necessary for trouble-shooting xen. >> >> Could Keir apply this feature? >> or more comments? > >Can it kexec to Xen yet? > > -- Keir > > >_______________________________________________ >Xen-devel mailing list >Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel