From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx6-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.39]:36371 "EHLO mx6-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752945AbbFUSSc (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jun 2015 14:18:32 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Is there a "nossd" option ? Message-Id: Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 14:18:26 -0400 (EDT) References: <1586648.BNplRrhkhg@zafu> <20150621223121.617b8894@natsu> <4527646.9Fsd4pK4E8@zafu> To: =?utf-8?Q?Sw=C3=A2mi_Petaramesh?= In-Reply-To: <4527646.9Fsd4pK4E8@zafu> Cc: Roman Mamedov , Btrfs BTRFS Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On Jun 21, 2015, at 1:11 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote: > > Le dimanche 21 juin 2015 22:31:21 Roman Mamedov a écrit : >> >> Yes the "nossd" option (written literally like that) does in fact exist. >> It would have taken you less time to try if it works, than to write this >> long-winded message. :) > > Possibly. Unless trying a non-existing mount option causes the mount to fail, > thus causing the system boot to fail, thus needing me to boot from a live > rescue CD... that would take much longer than writing an half-page > email ;-) > Man pages work well too :) http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/utopic/man8/mount.8.html Ericÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±ý»k~Ïâ