All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David CHAMPELOVIER" <david@champelovier.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: "heuristic overcommit" and fork()
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:26:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED3886372DB5491AAA799709DBA78F6F@david> (raw)

Hi,

Recently, I was unable to fork() a 38 GB process on a system with 64 GB RAM
and no swap.
Having a look at the kernel source, I surprisingly found that in "heuristic
overcommit" mode, fork() always checks that there is enough memory to
duplicate process memory.

As far as I know, overcommit was introduced in the kernel for several
reasons, and fork() was one of them, since applications often exec() just
after fork(). I know fork() is not the most judicious choice in this case,
but well, this is the way many applications are written.

Moreover, I can read in the proc man page that in "heuristic overcommit
mode", "obvious overcommits of address space are refused". I do not think
fork() is an obvious overcommit, that's why I would expect fork() to be
always accepted in this mode.

So, is there a reason why fork() checks for available memory in "heuristic
mode" ?

Thanks in advance.

--
David Champelovier


             reply	other threads:[~2009-02-11 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-11 19:26 David CHAMPELOVIER [this message]
2009-02-13  1:36 ` [PATCH] fix vmaccnt at fork (Was Re: "heuristic overcommit" and fork()) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-13  1:36   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-16 14:32   ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-16 14:32     ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-17  0:08     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-17  0:08       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ED3886372DB5491AAA799709DBA78F6F@david \
    --to=david@champelovier.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.