From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD67C10F1A for ; Wed, 1 May 2024 17:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout08.t-online.de (mailout08.t-online.de [194.25.134.20]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.2613.1714584548523026266 for ; Wed, 01 May 2024 10:29:08 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=none (message not signed); spf=pass (domain: t-online.de, ip: 194.25.134.20, mailfrom: f_l_k@t-online.de) Received: from fwd70.aul.t-online.de (fwd70.aul.t-online.de [10.223.144.96]) by mailout08.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A8711ACEB; Wed, 1 May 2024 19:29:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.178.67] ([84.163.42.233]) by fwd70.t-online.de with (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1s2DlQ-1E6QCW0; Wed, 1 May 2024 19:29:05 +0200 Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 19:29:05 +0200 From: Markus Volk Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-gnome][PATCH] nautilus: update 45.1 -> 46.1 To: Khem Raj Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <17CB013F8E1A4961.26557@lists.openembedded.org> X-Mailer: geary/44.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-rYSQ7hvy4VXmrnJsBJBr" X-TOI-EXPURGATEID: 150726::1714584545-02FFA89A-61787F95/0/0 CLEAN NORMAL X-TOI-MSGID: 770d8c66-0430-4ade-b81c-d602bb582efb List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Wed, 01 May 2024 17:29:15 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/110209 --=-rYSQ7hvy4VXmrnJsBJBr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed On Wed, May 1 2024 at 10:08:05 AM -07:00:00, Khem Raj wrote: > yes, there are a bunch of other 46.1 gnome recipe updates as well, are > they interdependent in some ways that we will need to revert them too. As far as I can see its only nautilus that will require glib-2.80. The other ones should be fine. But I'm not sure about the changes that are needed in networkmanager for glib-2.80. I haven't gotten around to checking if they would work with glib-2.78. Another problem I have is with hyprland and the chore update. Hyprland is still broken with sdbus-c++ 2.0, but I guess a fix for this can be backported , once the issue was adressed --=-rYSQ7hvy4VXmrnJsBJBr Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, May 1 2024 at 10:08:05 AM -07:00:00, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
yes, there are a bunch of other 46.1 gnome recipe updates as well, are they interdependent in some ways that we will need to revert them too.

As far as I can see its only nautilus that will require glib-2.80. The other ones should be fine.

But I'm not sure about the changes that are needed in networkmanager for glib-2.80. I haven't gotten around to checking if they would work with glib-2.78.

Another problem I have is with hyprland and the chore update.
Hyprland is still broken with sdbus-c++ 2.0, but I guess a fix for this can be backported , once the issue was adressed

--=-rYSQ7hvy4VXmrnJsBJBr--