From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=nKoE=R3=vger.kernel.org=netdev-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F32C43381
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 17:34:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC9621741
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 17:34:40 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tutanota.com header.i=@tutanota.com header.b="un0k8rSq"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1728935AbfCXRej (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:34:39 -0400
Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.162]:34358 "EHLO w1.tutanota.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726139AbfCXRei (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:34:38 -0400
Received: from w2.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.163])
        by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA450FA0335;
        Sun, 24 Mar 2019 17:34:36 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tutanota.com;
        s=20161216; t=1553448876;
        bh=Fi+xMNz2uJO6L/TlcwI7b5/WOecDZvikYj+E1XHTHWw=;
        h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From;
        b=un0k8rSq3hZob3CfADunn9XAA2Blo5YxWdeaJm/4zE1PJxKjoM9on7wPdbQXKd2JN
         kyDr/+wk3rC7FOxk5RdQAIIVBenS+by1IvrVv97af6cP2y/0+1XBjEfIYOe0od3wjO
         v8ujkImJkjsrktriuR71u6KtqDy6Oc4d7KdThE6c3YcN2Xin1IRPA0VqyTQNan7VJJ
         Vvyf028qa6pkhNXEsKOqbbDFrHE7Y4C+c1bgiZlXgNf6Z7MCAguOgL7GJ+054VlfWZ
         b9ETxLIw38xAZpWD7mzeYZwnw7ib9tQ0gPMTOuJiT6FMIHx411taaV6LS9AJibeguE
         3rHxOSqaTa6SQ==
Date:   Sun, 24 Mar 2019 18:34:36 +0100 (CET)
From:   <emersonbernier@tutanota.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc:     Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Stephen <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
        Kuznet <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>, Jason <jason@zx2c4.com>,
        Davem <davem@davemloft.net>
Message-ID: <LaklAOJ--3-1@tutanota.com>
In-Reply-To: <0e008631-e6f6-3c08-f76a-8069052f19ef@gmail.com>
References: <LaeckvP--3-1@tutanota.com> <f60d6632-2f3c-c371-08c1-30bcb6a25344@gmail.com> <LakduwN--3-1@tutanota.com> <0e008631-e6f6-3c08-f76a-8069052f19ef@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG][iproute2][5.0] ip route show table default: "Error: ipv4:
 FIB table does not exist."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org

Mar 24, 2019, 5:20 PM by dsahern@gmail.com:

> On 3/24/19 11:02 AM, > emersonbernier@tutanota.com <mailto:emersonbernier@tutanota.com>>  wrote:
>
>> Ok but previous versions of iproute2 didn't treat this as error and didn't exited with non-zero status. Is non existing default route a system error which needs fixing?
>>
>
> The kernel is returning that error, not iproute2.
>
I mean that with older versions of iproute2 this error isn't shown for userspace.
> It is the default *table*, not a default route.
>
True. Still the question remains: is non existing default table a system error which needs fixing?