Re: I think lib/copperplate depends on glibc while using dual kernel configuration.Am i right?

[cern@tuta.io]

Hi,
Apr 11, 2020, 09:22 by xenomai@xenomai.org:

> On 10.04.20 05:56, 孙世龙 via Xenomai wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>  I am using xenomai-3.1.
>>
>>  Two figures are contained in url
>> https://gitlab.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai/-/wikis/Start_Here.
>>
>>  Since the architecture showed in figure 2 named xenomai 3 single kernel
>> configuration, i could draw the conclusion that copperplate interface
>> depends on the glibc.
>>
>>  But i don't think i can draw the same conclusion from the Figure 1.
>> Xenomai 3 dual kernel configuration.
>>
>>  When i enable the --enable-pshared compiler option, I could clearlly see
>> the create_main_heap function calls shm_open which is provided by glibc.
>>  So, i think copperplate interface depends on glibc while using dual
>> kernel configuration.Am i right?
>>
>
> Xenomai does not replace a libc when using the cobalt mode. It only
> provides alternatives to certain time-sensitive services. So a libc,
> like glibc, remains a natural dependency, for Xenomai libs themselves as
> well as the target application.
>
What about musl or other libc interpretations? (I haven't tried it yet, it's in my plan.)

Cern.

>
> Jan
>