From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50381) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhCwo-0006ZU-7i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:41:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhCwl-0003HY-0h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:41:10 -0400 Received: from www.safe-mail.net ([212.29.227.230]:53768 helo=tapuz.safe-mail.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhCwk-0003GH-Of for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:41:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:40:42 -0400 From: "Namsun Ch'o" Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] Add argument filters to the seccomp sandbox List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: eduardo.otubo@profitbricks.com Cc: pmoore@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org > This looks good now. > Thanks for your contribution. > Acked-by: Eduardo Otubo > ps.: I'll create a pull request with all changes made so far on Friday. I was told on IRC to submit patches in smaller chunks, with a few new filters at a time. Should I wait until it is merged, or should I go ahead and post a v1 patch in a new thread against the patched qemu-seccomp.c now?