All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "LA Walsh" <law@sgi.com>
To: "lkml" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: IDE0 /dev/hda performance hit in 2217 on my HW - more info - maybe extended partitions
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:47:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <NBBBJGOOMDFADJDGDCPHCEJECJAA.law@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00111322024100.20267@dax.joh.cam.ac.uk>

Some further information in response to a private email, I did hdparm -ti
under both
2216 and 2217 -- they are identical -- this may be something weird
w/extended
partitions...

/dev/hda:
 multcount    =  0 (off)
 I/O support  =  0 (default 16-bit)
 unmaskirq    =  0 (off)
 using_dma    =  1 (on)
 keepsettings =  0 (off)
 nowerr       =  0 (off)
 readonly     =  0 (off)
 readahead    =  8 (on)
 geometry     = 3278/240/63, sectors = 49577472, start = 0

 Model=IBM-DARA-225000, FwRev=SHAOA50A, SerialNo=SQASQ023976
 Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
 RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
 BuffType=3(DualPortCache), BuffSize=418kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=off
 DblWordIO=no, OldPIO=2, DMA=yes, OldDMA=2
 CurCHS=17475/15/63, CurSects=16513875, LBA=yes, LBAsects=49577472
 tDMA={min:120,rec:120}, DMA modes: mword0 mword1 mword2
 IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, PIO modes: mode3 mode4
 UDMA modes: mode0 mode1 *mode2 mode3 mode4
 Drive Supports : ATA/ATAPI-4 T13 1153D revision 17 : ATA-1 ATA-2 ATA-3
ATA-4
---
Speed comparisons, 2216:
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  4.61 seconds = 13.88 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  4.65 seconds = 13.76 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  4.69 seconds = 13.65 MB/sec
2217:
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  4.59 seconds = 13.94 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  4.63 seconds = 13.82 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  4.56 seconds = 14.04 MB/sec

-------------

	After rebooting several times, I can get equally bad performance on both.
:-(

	Here's the key.  I read from /dev/hda, hda1, {hda4, hda5, hda6, hda7} hda3.

	The performance in reading from a, a1 and a3 is near or above 10M/s -- but
in the "Extended" partition, rates from 4-7 are all under 3M/s.  So what's
the
deal?  Why do extended partitions drop performance?  Here's the log.  Did
dd's if=device of=/dev/null, bs=128k count=1k.  Timings are interwoven with
vmstat
output:
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system
cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy
id
 1  0  0   1928   3188 432352  10976   1   3  3111     3  183   424   3   6
91
 0  0  0   1928   3448 432352  10984   0   0     1     0  125   352   1   1
98
 0  0  0   1928   3356 432352  11016   0   0     1     3  107   180   0   0
99
/dev/hda
 1  0  0   1928   2068 433716  10984   0   0 12597     3  302   598   0  11
89
 1  0  0   1928   2196 433600  10972   0   0  6810     0  208   388   0   6
94
 0  1  0   1928   2132 433668  10968   0   0  8806     0  239   454   0  12
88
 0  1  0   1928   2132 433668  10968   0   0  5914     0  193   357   0   4
96
 2  0  0   1928   2100 430184  10484   0   0 12365     0  295   558   0  12
88
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
0.01user 2.31system 0:27.43elapsed 8%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (104major+76minor)pagefaults 0swaps
/dev/hda1
 0  2  0   2572   2120 426948  10268   0 129 11805    33  292   544   0  14
86
 0  1  0   2572   2940 422320  10268   0   0 10972     0  275   511   0  11
89
 1  0  0   2572   2660 419024  10268   0   0 10266     2  264   485   0   9
91
 0  1  0   2572   2052 418192  10268   0   0 11789     0  285   554   0  13
87
 2  0  0   2572   2176 418044  10296   0   0 13045     0  307   608   0  17
83
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
0.01user 2.83system 0:22.71elapsed 12%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (104major+76minor)pagefaults 0swaps
/dev/hda3
 1  0  0   2572   2048 418168  10296   0   0 14220     0  324   655   0  11
89
 0  1  0   2572   2180 418040  10296   0   0  7027     3  213   398   0   7
93
 0  1  0   2700   2116 418104  10424   0  26  8858     7  240   460   0  10
90
 1  0  0   2956   2112 418464  10288   0  51  9651    13  253   488   0  17
83
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
0.03user 2.65system 0:24.70elapsed 10%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (104major+76minor)pagefaults 0swaps
/dev/hda4
 2  1  0   2952   2736 417752  10424  26   0 13216     0  310   577   0  14
86
 1  0  0   2952   2192 419716  10544  26   0  2159     0  237   428   0   9
91
 1  0  0   2952   2808 419488  10484   0   0  2304     2  247   456   0   9
91
 1  0  0   2948   3092 420260  10476   0   0  2406     1  252   461   0   9
91
   procs                      memory    swap          io     system
cpu
 r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy
id
 1  0  0   2948   2304 421540  10476   0   0  2355     0  249   459   0   7
93
 2  0  0   2948   2588 421604  10476   0   0  2496     0  257   480   0   9
91
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
0.01user 2.12system 0:28.64elapsed 7%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (104major+76minor)pagefaults 0swaps
/dev/hda5
 1  0  0   2948   2340 423172  10476   0   0  2394     1  251   471   0   8
92
 1  0  0   3460   2596 425420   9988   0 102  2752    28  282   512   0  12
88
 1  0  0   3460   2868 427536   9988   0   0  3162     0  299   559   0  12
88
 1  0  0   3460   3088 428432   9988   0   0  3021     0  290   550   0  10
90
 2  0  0   3460   2192 430288   9988   0   0  3059     0  293   550   0  12
88
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
0.02user 2.27system 0:21.96elapsed 10%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (104major+76minor)pagefaults 0swaps
/dev/hda6
 0  1  0   3460   2192 430560   9988   0   0  2410     3  257   485   0   9
91
 1  0  0   3460   2180 431232   9988   0   0  3085     0  295   560   0  11
89
 1  0  0   3460   3068 430812   9988   0   0  2573     1  262   498   0   7
93
 1  0  0   3460   2068 432412   9988   0   0  3162     0  299   577   0  10
90
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
0.00user 2.01system 0:24.25elapsed 8%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (104major+76minor)pagefaults 0swaps
/dev/hda7
  2  0  0   3460   2176 432488   9988   0   0  2292     1  246   464   0   9
91
 1  0  0   3460   2196 432584   9988   0   0  2637     3  268   502   0  11
89
 1  0  0   3460   3100 431980   9992   0   0  2662     1  268   508   0  10
90
 0  1  0   3460   2192 433284   9992   0   0  2380     0  249   462   0   8
92
 1  0  0   3460   2184 433572   9992  11   0  1334     0  185   324   0   6
94
 2  0  0   3452   2176 434184  10044   2   0  2970     0  287   543   0  12
88
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
0.00user 2.32system 0:27.18elapsed 8%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (104major+76minor)pagefaults 0swaps
 1  0  0   3452   3028 433744  10044   0   0   794     0  151   256   0   3
97
 0  0  0   3452   3156 433616  10044   0   0     0     0  102   143   0   0
100
 0  0  0   3452   3132 433616  10044   0   0     0     0  114   241   1   0
99
 0  0  0   3452   3132 433616  10044   0   0     0     0  114   182   0   0
100

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

       reply	other threads:[~2000-11-14  0:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <00111322024100.20267@dax.joh.cam.ac.uk>
2000-11-13 23:47 ` LA Walsh [this message]
2000-11-14  0:58   ` IDE0 /dev/hda performance hit in 2217 on my HW - more info - maybe extended partitions Andries Brouwer
2000-11-14  7:21     ` LA Walsh
2000-11-15  0:16     ` LA Walsh
2000-11-15  0:22       ` Andre Hedrick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=NBBBJGOOMDFADJDGDCPHCEJECJAA.law@sgi.com \
    --to=law@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.