From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: acurtis@directvinternet.com
Reply-To: <acurtis@directvinternet.com>
To: "Eugene Surovegin" <ebs@innocent.com>,
	<joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se>
Cc: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: RE: Is the preemptive kernel patch unsafe for 8xx/PPC?
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:08:49 -0800
Message-ID: <NCBBIINEHIPFGJPLBEIFEEALEAAA.acurtis@directvinternet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20021212102609.02d48730@pop.prodigy.net>
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


Can you be more specific about the "bugs". I just installed the patch. The
patch did not apply cleanly. Is this what you are referring to? It was
simple to fix the rejects.

THX

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
> [mailto:owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org]On Behalf Of Eugene
> Surovegin
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:28 AM
> To: joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
> Subject: Re: Is the preemptive kernel patch unsafe for 8xx/PPC?
>
>
>
> At 04:56 AM 12/12/2002, you wrote:
> >I am testing the latest(2.4.20-1) preemtive kernel patch from
> Robert Love and
> >I wonder if anybody know if it's unsafe/not working for 8xx or
> PPC in general?
>
> I haven't tested patch for 2.4.20 but patch for 2.4.19 contained
> some bugs.
>
>
>   Eugene Surovegin <mailto:ebs@innocent.com>
>
>
>
>
>


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/