From: "J. Ryan Earl" <ryan@dynaconnections.com>
To: Janusz Zamecki <janusz@pipi.ma.cx>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:18:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OMEKLMBKKEOEENCKLEIDOEFICAAA.ryan@dynaconnections.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1106073663.14134.249.camel@pipi.ma.cx>
I missed that, sounds like you got an IDE concurrency problem. Perhaps you
can't read from both ports for some reason. Don't think it's a raid problem
though.
-ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Janusz Zamecki [mailto:janusz@pipi.ma.cx]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 12:41 PM
To: J. Ryan Earl
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem
W liście z wto, 18-01-2005, godz. 18:34, J. Ryan Earl pisze:
> "You will get 2 parallel sequential reads at around 120MB/sec
> assuming you're not bus limited."
>
> To clarify because this looks ambiguous to me now, you should be able to
> perform 2 parallel sequential reads both at 60MB/sec = 120MB/sec total.
>
> -ryan
>
Hi,
Unfortunatelly it is not the case. Please go to my original e-mail. I've
ran two simultaneous tests and I get:
hdparm -t /dev/md6 &
hdparm -t /dev/md6
This is the result:
--disk/hdg----disk/hde-
_read write _read write
0 0 : 0 0
0 0 : 0 0
124k 0 :26.0M 0
368k 0 :45.5M 0
0 0 : 0 0
0 0 : 896k 0
124k 0 :1568k 0
0 0 : 0 0
One disk works with 75% of its full speed, the second one works with
0,6% of its full speed or even less.
Best regards, Janusz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-18 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-17 15:22 RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-17 15:39 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-01-17 15:51 ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-01-17 16:46 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-18 13:18 ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-01-18 13:43 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-17 20:49 ` Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-17 16:24 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-01-17 16:51 ` Is this hdparm -t output correct? (was Re: RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem) Andy Smith
2005-01-17 17:04 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-01-17 18:26 ` RAID1 Corruption Markus Gehring
2005-01-17 19:14 ` Paul Clements
2005-01-17 19:35 ` Tony Mantler
2005-01-17 19:42 ` Markus Gehring
2005-01-17 19:21 ` Sven Anders
2005-01-18 17:32 ` RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem J. Ryan Earl
2005-01-18 17:34 ` J. Ryan Earl
2005-01-18 18:41 ` Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-18 19:18 ` J. Ryan Earl [this message]
2005-01-18 19:34 ` Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-18 19:12 ` Janusz Zamecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OMEKLMBKKEOEENCKLEIDOEFICAAA.ryan@dynaconnections.com \
--to=ryan@dynaconnections.com \
--cc=janusz@pipi.ma.cx \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.