From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khali@linux-fr.org (Jean Delvare) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:15:01 +0000 Subject: [lm-sensors] Re: I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted Message-Id: List-Id: In-Reply-To: <42F95E9E.90204@yahoo.com> References: <20050809231328.0726537b.khali@linux-fr.org> In-Reply-To: <20050809231328.0726537b.khali@linux-fr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: salahx@yahoo.com Cc: LKML , LM Sensors Hi Salah, [Salah Coronya] > I have a VT8235 chipset, I applied the patch to my kernel > (2.6.12-gentoo-r6), compared the "before" and "after" eeproms in /sys > with diff and they are the same. Beware that eeprom files are binary files, so "diff" might not be the more suitable tool for the job. "cmp" would probably do better. Nevertheless, I think I remember that diff can at least differenciate between identical and different binary files, so your test must still be valid. > So it seems to work with VT8235. Yes, it does. Antonino A. Daplas reported success on his VT8235 in private as well, so I am now confident that this chip is OK. The question remains for VT82C686A and B though. Thanks for your help! -- Jean Delvare From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932554AbVHJKPL (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:15:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932558AbVHJKPL (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:15:11 -0400 Received: from [213.91.10.50] ([213.91.10.50]:10981 "EHLO zone4.gcu-squad.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932554AbVHJKPK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:15:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:06:59 +0200 (CEST) To: salahx@yahoo.com Subject: Re: I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted X-IlohaMail-Blah: khali@localhost X-IlohaMail-Method: mail() [mem] X-IlohaMail-Dummy: moo X-Mailer: IlohaMail/0.8.14 (On: webmail.gcu.info) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <42F95E9E.90204@yahoo.com> From: "Jean Delvare" Bounce-To: "Jean Delvare" CC: LKML , LM Sensors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (zone4.gcu-squad.org [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:06:59 +0200 (CEST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Salah, [Salah Coronya] > I have a VT8235 chipset, I applied the patch to my kernel > (2.6.12-gentoo-r6), compared the "before" and "after" eeproms in /sys > with diff and they are the same. Beware that eeprom files are binary files, so "diff" might not be the more suitable tool for the job. "cmp" would probably do better. Nevertheless, I think I remember that diff can at least differenciate between identical and different binary files, so your test must still be valid. > So it seems to work with VT8235. Yes, it does. Antonino A. Daplas reported success on his VT8235 in private as well, so I am now confident that this chip is OK. The question remains for VT82C686A and B though. Thanks for your help! -- Jean Delvare