While cross-compiling warzone2100 for aarch64, I ran into issues with protobuf, which are fixed by this patch.
I also updated the recipe, but I think there must be a reason we're still using v6. So I submitted this as an RFC.

Am So, 19. Jul 2026 um 16:46:31 +02:00:00 schrieb Markus Volk via lists.openembedded.org <f_l_k=t-online.de@lists.openembedded.org>:
- Remove PROTOC_VERSION. It now matches PV - Adjust PROTOC_BRANCH - Do not build with a custom configuration for protobuf-native; in particular, do not build shared libraries - protobuf-native only needs to provide the binaries. Do not package the library and includes to avoid potential linking failures --- .../{protobuf_6.33.6.bb => protobuf_35.1.bb} | 19 +++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) rename meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/{protobuf_6.33.6.bb => protobuf_35.1.bb} (92%) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_6.33.6.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_35.1.bb similarity index 92% rename from meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_6.33.6.bb rename to meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_35.1.bb index 880dd82b1d..dd3f364de2 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_6.33.6.bb +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_35.1.bb @@ -10,21 +10,20 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = " \ file://third_party/utf8_range/LICENSE;md5=d4974d297231477b2ff507c35d61c13c \ " -PROTOC_VERSION = "v${@d.getVar('PV').split('.', 1)[1]}" -PROTOC_BRANCH = "${@d.getVar('PV').split('.', 2)[1]}.x" +PROTOC_BRANCH = "${@d.getVar('PV').split('.')[0]}.x" DEPENDS = "zlib abseil-cpp jsoncpp" DEPENDS:append:class-target = " protobuf-native" -SRCREV = "6e1998413a5bca7c058b85999667893f167434bc" +SRCREV = "35cd01f9fe9afbeea38cc7b979a3b6bfcde82c03" -SRC_URI = "git://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf.git;branch=${PROTOC_BRANCH};protocol=https;tag=${PROTOC_VERSION} \ +SRC_URI = "git://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf.git;branch=${PROTOC_BRANCH};protocol=https;tag=v${PV} \ file://run-ptest \ file://0001-examples-Makefile-respect-CXX-LDFLAGS-variables-fix-.patch \ file://0001-fix-protobuf-native-build-failure-with-gcc-10.patch \ " -UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX = "v(?P<pver>\d\.\d+\.\d+)" +UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX = "v(?P<pver>\d\.\d+)" CVE_PRODUCT = "google:protobuf protobuf:protobuf google-protobuf protobuf-cpp" @@ -39,7 +38,7 @@ PACKAGECONFIG:class-nativesdk ?= "compiler" PACKAGECONFIG[python] = ",," PACKAGECONFIG[compiler] = "-Dprotobuf_BUILD_PROTOC_BINARIES=ON,-Dprotobuf_BUILD_PROTOC_BINARIES=OFF" -EXTRA_OECMAKE += "\ +EXTRA_OECMAKE:class-target = "\ -Dprotobuf_BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON \ -Dprotobuf_BUILD_LIBPROTOC=ON \ -Dprotobuf_BUILD_TESTS=OFF \ @@ -100,6 +99,14 @@ do_compile_ptest() { export PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR=$save_pkg_config_sysroot_dir } +do_install:append:class-native() { + rm -rf ${D}${libdir} ${D}${includedir} +} + +do_install:append:class-nativesdk() { + rm -rf ${D}${libdir} ${D}${includedir} +} + do_install_ptest() { local olddir=`pwd`
--
2.55.0
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#128259): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/128259 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/120344566/3618223 Group Owner: openembedded-devel+owner@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [f_l_k@t-online.de] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-