From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:31:15 +0100 (CET)
From: Armin Schindler <armin.schindler@sysgo.com>
To: Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: linuxppc latest ?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0401191852470.551@waterleaf.sonytel.be>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403151120080.4038@acs.sysgo.com>
References: <20040118122134.GA4994@iliana> <20040119152954.GD13454@stop.crashing.org>
 <20040119154758.GA23038@iliana> <20040119155801.GF13454@stop.crashing.org>
 <20040119163857.GB23613@iliana> <20040119164849.GG13454@stop.crashing.org>
 <20040119170741.GA23943@iliana> <20040119172251.GH13454@stop.crashing.org>
 <20040119173000.GA24440@iliana> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0401191839350.551@waterleaf.sonytel.be>
 <20040119174950.GA24764@iliana> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0401191852470.551@waterleaf.sonytel.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


Hi all,

I'm somehow confused with the status of linuxppc.

If I want to patch my 2.4.25 kernel, what should I do to have the
latest linuxppc code ?

penguinppc.org tells me to use bitkeeper's linuxppc-2.4, but this tree
seems to be incomplete (directory arch/ppc/8260_io is missing).
Even together with the main linux-2.4 tree, some features I know from
the "old" snapshots are missing.

Am I using bitkeeper wrong or what source should I use ?

Thanks,
Armin


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/