From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Steven N. Hirsch" Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 00:07:03 +0000 Subject: [Kernel-janitors] Re: sb1000.c::nicedelay() (msleep) Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8130666102125188==" List-Id: To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============8130666102125188== Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > So, this function (drivers/net/sb1000.c::nicedelay()) takes as parameter some > value in usecs (which is also the name of the parameter). Then, it sleeps for > 1 second (schedule_timeout(HZ)) regardless of the parameter. Is this desired? > If so, I will replace the calls (all 3 of them) with msleep(). Or, should the > passed in values (60000, 30000 and 200000) actually be being used and not > ignored? Thanks. Are these cards still being used? I switched to 2-way cable almost (3) years ago and haven't looked back. --===============8130666102125188== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============8130666102125188==--