From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Sims Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:16:23 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] What Cisco calls 'Overloading NAT'?? Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Hi Oscar, I am doing the existing routing (only!) with a pretty bare Ubuntu server install... i.e., no firewall and no iptables at this point.... Cisco (in at least some software) allows many:1 NAT with a pool of NAT addresses rather than a single address.... This way, every connection seems to come from a different post-NAT address (at least up to the number of addresses in the pool).... I am curious if Linux iproute2 supports this concept?? Dave ************************************************************************* On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Oscar Mechanic wrote: > Is that not multiple NETMAP entries in iptables. Are you using > SIP/H323/MGCP > > > On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 09:02 -0600, David Sims wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there a way in Linux to do NAT with a pool of outside addresses such > > that each connection to the outside resource gets a different IP address?? > > I don't want 1:1 NAT as I have some thousands of IP addresses on one side > > of the LARTC router that _may_ need to access a resource on the other > > side... The resource needs to see a different IP address for each active > > call, but these addresses can be reused after the call concludes.... > > > > Any clues?? > > > > TIA, > > > > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > > LARTC mailing list > > LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc