From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Szabolcs Szakacsits Subject: Re: [patch] util-linux-ng: unprivileged mounts support Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:42:33 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: util-linux-ng-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: util-linux-ng-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org, serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, viro-rfM+Q5joDG/XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org, kzak-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > But 'fusermount -u /tmp/test' does work, doesn't it? You're submitting patches to get rid of fusermount, aren't you? Most users absolutely have no idea what fusermount is and they would __really__ like to see umount(8) working finally. Szaka -- NTFS-3G: http://ntfs-3g.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757596AbYASVmU (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:42:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751591AbYASVmI (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:42:08 -0500 Received: from emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.117]:50966 "EHLO emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751043AbYASVmH (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:42:07 -0500 Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:42:33 +0200 (MET DST) From: Szabolcs Szakacsits X-X-Sender: szaka@dhcppc1 To: Miklos Szeredi cc: util-linux-ng@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org, serue@us.ibm.com, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, kzak@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.osdl.org Subject: Re: [patch] util-linux-ng: unprivileged mounts support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Antivirus: VAMS Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > But 'fusermount -u /tmp/test' does work, doesn't it? You're submitting patches to get rid of fusermount, aren't you? Most users absolutely have no idea what fusermount is and they would __really__ like to see umount(8) working finally. Szaka -- NTFS-3G: http://ntfs-3g.org