All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@ntfs-3g.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS vs Elevators (was Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system)
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:52:31 +0300 (MET DST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0808231454210.4532@dhcppc2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0808221519000.4532@dhcppc2>


On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 08:33:50PM +0300, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
> >
> > > The 'nobarrier' mount option made a big improvement:
> > 
> > INteresting. Barriers make only a little difference on my laptop;
> > 10-20% slower. But yes, barriers will have this effect on XFS.
> > 
> > If you've got NCQ, then you'd do better to turn off write caching
> > on the drive, turn off barriers and use NCQ to give you back the
> > performance that the write cache used to. That is, of course,
> > assuming the NCQ implementation doesn't suck....
> 
> Write cache off, nobarrier and AHCI NCQ lowered the XFS result:
> 
>                                MB/s    Runtime (s)
>                               -----    -----------
>   btrfs unstable              17.09        572
>   ext3                        13.24        877
>   btrfs 0.16                  12.33        793
>   ntfs-3g unstable            11.52        673
>   nilfs2 2nd+ runs            11.29        674
>   reiserfs                     8.38        966
>   xfs nobarrier                7.89        949
>   nilfs2 1st run               4.95       3800
>   xfs nobarrier, ncq, wc off   3.81       1973
>   xfs                          1.88       3901

Retested with a different disk, SATA-II, NCQ, capable of 70-110 MB/s 
read/write:

                               MB/s    Runtime (s)
                              -----    -----------
  btrfs unstable, no dup      51.42        168
  btrfs unstable              42.67        197
  ext4 2.6.26                 35.63        245
  nilfs2 2nd+ runs            26.43        287
  ntfs-3g unstable            21.41        370
  ext3                        19.92        559
  xfs nobarrier               14.17        562
  reiserfs                    13.11        595
  nilfs2 1st run              12.06       3719
  xfs nobarrier, ncq, wc off   6.89       1070
  xfs                          1.95       3786

	Szaka

-- 
NTFS-3G:  http://ntfs-3g.org

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-23 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-20  2:45 [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system Ryusuke Konishi
2008-08-20  7:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-20  8:22   ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-20 18:47     ` Ryusuke Konishi
2008-08-20 16:13   ` Ryusuke Konishi
2008-08-20 21:25     ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2008-08-20 21:39       ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-20 21:48         ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2008-08-21  2:12         ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-21  2:46           ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2008-08-21  5:15             ` XFS vs Elevators (was Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system) Dave Chinner
2008-08-21  6:00               ` gus3
2008-08-21  6:14                 ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-21  7:00                   ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-21  8:53                     ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-21  9:33                       ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-21 17:08                         ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-21 17:08                           ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-22  2:29                           ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-22  2:29                             ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-25  1:59                             ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-25  4:32                               ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-25 12:01                               ` Jamie Lokier
2008-08-25 12:01                                 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-08-26  3:07                                 ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-26  3:50                                   ` david
2008-08-27  1:20                                     ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-27 21:54                                       ` david
2008-08-28  1:08                                         ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-21 14:52                       ` Chris Mason
2008-08-21 14:52                         ` Chris Mason
2008-08-21  6:04               ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-21  8:07                 ` Aaron Carroll
2008-08-21  8:25                 ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-21 11:02                   ` Martin Steigerwald
2008-08-21 15:00                     ` Martin Steigerwald
2008-08-21 15:00                       ` Martin Steigerwald
2008-08-21 17:10                   ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2008-08-21 17:33                     ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2008-08-22  2:24                       ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-22  6:49                         ` Martin Steigerwald
2008-08-22  6:49                           ` Martin Steigerwald
2008-08-22 12:44                         ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2008-08-23 12:52                           ` Szabolcs Szakacsits [this message]
2008-08-21 11:53                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-21 15:56                   ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-21 12:51       ` [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system Chris Mason
2008-08-26 10:16     ` Jörn Engel
2008-08-26 16:54       ` Ryusuke Konishi
2008-08-27 18:13         ` Jörn Engel
2008-08-27 18:13           ` Jörn Engel
2008-08-27 18:19         ` Jörn Engel
2008-08-27 18:19           ` Jörn Engel
2008-08-29  6:29           ` Ryusuke Konishi
2008-08-29  8:40             ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-29 10:51               ` konishi.ryusuke
2008-08-29 11:04                 ` Jörn Engel
2008-08-29 10:45             ` Jörn Engel
2008-08-29 10:45               ` Jörn Engel
2008-08-29 16:37               ` Ryusuke Konishi
2008-08-29 16:37                 ` Ryusuke Konishi
2008-08-29 19:16                 ` Jörn Engel
2008-08-29 19:16                   ` Jörn Engel
2008-09-01 12:25                   ` Ryusuke Konishi
2008-09-01 12:25                     ` Ryusuke Konishi
2008-08-20  9:47 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-21  4:57   ` Ryusuke Konishi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-21 11:05 XFS vs Elevators (was Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous snapshotting file system) Martin Knoblauch
2008-08-21 11:05 ` Martin Knoblauch
2008-08-21 15:59 ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0808231454210.4532@dhcppc2 \
    --to=szaka@ntfs-3g.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.