From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>, Chris Lee <clee@kde.org>,
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git-index-pack really does suck..
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 14:13:06 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704031411320.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070403210319.GH27706@spearce.org>
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
>
> So even with --paranoid (aka what we have now) index-pack still
> should be faster than unpack-objects for any sizeable transfer,
> and is just as "safe".
I agree 100% that index-pack is much much MUCH better than unpack-objects
ever was, so ..
> If its the missing-object lookup that is expensive, maybe we should
> try to optimize that. We do it enough already in other parts of
> the code...
Well, for all other cases it's really the "object found" case that is
worth optimizing for, so I think optimizing for "no object" is actually
wrong, unless it also speeds up (or at least doesn't make it worse) the
"real" normal case.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-03 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-03 15:15 git-index-pack really does suck Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <db 69205d0704031227q1009eabfhdd82aa3636f25bb6@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.07 04031304420.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704031322490.67 30@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <Pi ne.LNX.4.64.0704031413200.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.0.98. 0704031836350.28181@xanadu.home>
2007-04-03 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 16:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 16:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 19:27 ` Chris Lee
2007-04-03 19:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 19:54 ` Chris Lee
2007-04-03 20:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 20:32 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 20:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-03 21:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 21:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 22:49 ` Chris Lee
2007-04-03 23:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 20:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 21:03 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 21:13 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2007-04-03 21:17 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 21:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 21:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 22:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-03 22:38 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 22:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-05 10:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] git-fetch--tool pick-rref Junio C Hamano
2007-04-05 10:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] git-fetch: use fetch--tool pick-rref to avoid local fetch from alternate Junio C Hamano
2007-04-05 16:15 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-05 21:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-03 21:34 ` git-index-pack really does suck Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 21:37 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 21:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-03 21:53 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 22:10 ` Jeff King
2007-04-03 22:40 ` Dana How
2007-04-03 22:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 22:31 ` David Lang
2007-04-03 23:00 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 21:21 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 21:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 21:11 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 21:24 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <alpine.LF D.0.98.0704031735470.28181@xanadu.home>
2007-04-03 21:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 22:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-03 22:11 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-04-03 22:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 22:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-04-03 22:36 ` David Lang
2007-04-04 9:51 ` Alex Riesen
[not found] ` <P ine.LNX.4.63.0704061455380.24050@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
2007-04-06 21:56 ` David Lang
2007-04-06 22:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-06 22:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-06 22:22 ` David Lang
2007-04-06 22:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-06 22:28 ` David Lang
2007-04-03 23:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-03 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-04-03 20:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0704031411320.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clee@kde.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.