On Tue, Sep 16 2025 at 18:26:32 +02:00:00, Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com> wrote:

This needs more detail. What else would be providing virtual/ffmpeg, other than ffmpeg itself? Why the justification is talking about 'different versions', and not different providers?

I was talking about versions, because thats what I use it for. A different provider would be e.g libav,but in meta-kodi I have older versions of ffmpeg

called ffmpeg-6 and ffmpeg-7 and let them provide virtual/ffmpeg. Dont ask me why I didn't stick with

preferred_version. I only remember that I had issues with using it but not exactly what it was. But if you think this

is the way it should be, I can give it another try