From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB78C83F1F for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 02:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout12.t-online.de (mailout12.t-online.de [194.25.134.22]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.5889.1693190597264745482 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 19:43:17 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=none (message not signed); spf=none, err=SPF record not found (domain: t-online.de, ip: 194.25.134.22, mailfrom: f_l_k@t-online.de) Received: from fwd85.aul.t-online.de (fwd85.aul.t-online.de [10.223.144.111]) by mailout12.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D3846975; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:43:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.178.62] ([79.219.230.67]) by fwd85.t-online.de with (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1qaSDh-2jJS2S0; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:43:13 +0200 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:43:07 +0200 From: Markus Volk Subject: Re: [meta-virtualization][PATCHv2] libvirt: update from fuse2 to fuse3 To: Bruce Ashfield Cc: meta-virtualization@lists.yoctoproject.org Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20230824081002.6730-1-f_l_k@t-online.de> X-Mailer: geary/44.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-98EjP6QKRSHzT/LRPcNM" X-TOI-EXPURGATEID: 150726::1693190593-BCFFAEAB-E1B7709F/0/0 CLEAN NORMAL X-TOI-MSGID: 37c7c1c8-a380-4874-a5b2-2d8d053c029b List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 02:43:26 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/message/8244 --=-98EjP6QKRSHzT/LRPcNM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed On Sun, Aug 27 2023 at 01:30:22 PM +00:00:00, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > It is worth re-testing master-next and 9.6.0 to see if > everything still works as you expect. Thanks, I will do the tests with the master-next branch. One question about the other patch I sent. Do you have build issues with it or do you not want to support introspection at all? I ask because the "gnome-boxes" recipe I recently sent to meta-gnome depends on vala bindings for libvirt-glib and cannot be built without the patch. For the latter case, it would be better to remove gnome-boxes from meta-gnome again. --=-98EjP6QKRSHzT/LRPcNM Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, Aug 27 2023 at 01:30:22 PM +00:00:00, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote:
It is worth re-testing master-next and 9.6.0 to see if everything still works as you expect.

Thanks, I will do the tests with the master-next branch.

One question about the other patch I sent. Do you have build issues with it or do you not want to support introspection at all?
I ask because the "gnome-boxes" recipe I recently sent to meta-gnome depends on vala bindings for libvirt-glib and cannot be built without the patch. For the latter case, it would be better to remove gnome-boxes from meta-gnome again.
--=-98EjP6QKRSHzT/LRPcNM--