From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1EpppG-0008JZ-L2 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:31:26 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EpppD-0008Gm-1x for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:31:23 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EpppA-0008Cu-NO for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:31:22 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eppp9-0008C6-H3 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:31:20 -0500 Received: from [69.17.117.51] (helo=webmail4.sea5.speakeasy.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1EppoT-0004ma-3F for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:30:37 -0500 Received: (qmail 13111 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2005 16:30:11 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO webmail4) ([127.0.0.1]) (envelope-sender ) by localhost (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Dec 2005 16:30:11 -0000 Received: from 206.229.31.42 (unverified [206.229.31.42]) by webmail4 (VisualMail 4.0) with WEBMAIL id 6552; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:30:11 +0000 From: andre-smith@speakeasy.net To: "The development of GRUB 2" Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Normal Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mintersoft VisualMail, Build 4.0.111601 X-Originating-IP: [206.229.31.42] Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:30:11 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Nested Function Patches X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:31:24 -0000 Hehe. I thought someone would say that :-). I just thought I would try on= e last time. I am switching over to Ubuntu for my development environment= . In the future, I hope Apple discusses changes like this with the commun= ity and get consensus before crippling a major tool. Sorry for any noise = that I may have caused. Andre > -----Original Message----- > From: Marco Gerards [mailto:mgerards@xs4all.nl] > Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 08:33 AM > To: 'The development of GRUB 2' > Subject: Re: Nested Function Patches > > Andre Smith writes: > > > As I mentioned before, Apple has disabled nested function support for= > > GRUB2. Would the group be willing to accept patches addressing this > > issue? I would like to see GRUB2 on Mac OS X. I do have a very simple= > > patch for help.c, and I would like continue the work with the groups > > blessing. > > You can better send a patch to the apple folks, they broke nested > functions. See the previous discussion about this on the mailinglist. > > -- > Marco > > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >