From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7E4D7830F for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 11:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout01.t-online.de (mailout01.t-online.de [194.25.134.80]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.172127.1733139436376526392 for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 03:37:16 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=none (message not signed); spf=pass (domain: t-online.de, ip: 194.25.134.80, mailfrom: f_l_k@t-online.de) Received: from fwd80.aul.t-online.de (fwd80.aul.t-online.de [10.223.144.106]) by mailout01.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 258481013; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 12:37:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.178.67] ([84.154.160.60]) by fwd80.t-online.de with (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1tI4jp-1CicwS0; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 12:37:13 +0100 Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 12:37:08 +0100 From: Markus Volk Subject: Re: [RFC][oe-core][PATCH] pam: update 1.6.1 -> 1.7.0 To: Alexander Kanavin Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20241202105339.58026-1-f_l_k@t-online.de> X-Mailer: geary/46.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-Hl6cMZ4qOaxGxx108Zau" X-TOI-EXPURGATEID: 150726::1733139433-38FF926E-A59DDB72/0/0 CLEAN NORMAL X-TOI-MSGID: d9df3843-d006-4890-81a4-541e9e23a74c List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 11:37:18 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/208140 --=-Hl6cMZ4qOaxGxx108Zau Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed On Mon, Dec 2 2024 at 12:06:17 +01:00:00, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Please see my comment elsewhere, it's better to split this into > several patches, each dealing with a particular issue (in particular > the version update shouldn't be bundled with all the other changes). > > Alex Fair enough. I haven't gotten around to cleaning it up yet and there is also still a patch in it with ;apply=no that needs to be deleted. I'd better wait for the update and add the changes afterwards. I just wanted to submit the patch for review to see if that would even be an optionat all --=-Hl6cMZ4qOaxGxx108Zau Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, Dec 2 2024 at 12:06:17 +01:00:00, Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com> wrote:
Please see my comment elsewhere, it's better to split this into several patches, each dealing with a particular issue (in particular the version update shouldn't be bundled with all the other changes). Alex

Fair enough. I haven't gotten around to cleaning it up yet and there is also still
a patch in it with ;apply=no that needs to be deleted. I'd better wait for the update
and add the changes afterwards. I just wanted to submit the patch for review to see
if that would even be an optionat all
--=-Hl6cMZ4qOaxGxx108Zau--