From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Fix variable reset during IRQ probing
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:51:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/+xr/L+m2k5fObZ@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210113120021.59045-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:00:21PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> In tpm_tis_core_init(), tpm2_probe() will be called first, this
> function will eventually call tpm_tis_send(), and then
> tpm_tis_probe_irq_single() will detect whether the interrupt is
> normal, mainly the installation interrupted, set `priv->irq_tested`
> to false. The logic will eventually be executed to tpm_tis_send()
> to trigger an interrupt.
>
> There is currently such a scenario, which will cause the IRQ probe
> code to never be executed, so that the TPM device is in polling
> mode: after setting irq_tested to false, an interrupt occurs
> between entering the ttpm_tis_send() function, and the interrupt
> will be first set irq_tested to true will cause the IRQ probe code
> to never be executed.
Can you describe the scenario more detail?
> It seems that this interrupt comes from tpm2_probe(). Although the
> interrupt has not been installed when tpm2_probe() is called, the
> interrupt of tpm2_probe() is only received after IRQ detection.
>
> This patch solves this issue by introducing a new variable, which
> is only used in interrupts, and irq_tested only marks whether the
> interrupt test has been completed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
I'm not sure I understand this patch. TPM should be in polling
mode. This is also assumption before calling tpm_get_timeouts():
/* Before doing irq testing issue a command to the TPM in polling mode
* to make sure it works. May as well use that command to set the
* proper timeouts for the driver.
*/
if (tpm_get_timeouts(chip)) {
dev_err(dev, "Could not get TPM timeouts and durations\n");
rc = -ENODEV;
goto out_err;
}
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-13 12:00 [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Fix variable reset during IRQ probing Tianjia Zhang
2021-01-14 2:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2021-01-14 4:12 ` Tianjia Zhang
2021-01-15 9:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-01-20 4:03 ` Tianjia Zhang
2021-01-28 5:20 ` [LTP] [tpm/tpm_tis] cad8219df0: BUG:unable_to_handle_page_fault_for_address kernel test robot
2021-01-28 5:20 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-28 5:20 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X/+xr/L+m2k5fObZ@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.