From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com, jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com,
corbet@lwn.net, yanaijie@huawei.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
intel-linux-scu@intel.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: libsas and users: Remove notifier indirection
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:25:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/2HDUmb8L8LPELG@lx-t490> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1610386112-132641-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
Hi John,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:28:32AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> LLDDs report events to libsas with .notify_port_event and
> .notify_phy_event callbacks.
>
> These callbacks are fixed and so there is no reason why the functions
> cannot be called directly, so do that.
>
> This neatens the code slightly, makes it more obvious, and reduces
> function pointer usage, which is generally a good thing. Downside is that
> there are 2x more symbol exports.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
>
Since this patch necessitates a careful manual rebase of _every_ patch
in my series, I've included it at the top of my v2 submission and
rebased everything on top:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210112110647.627783-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de
Some left-over 'sas_ha' local variables were removed, and I've mentioned
that in the commit log of course.
Thanks!
--
Ahmed S. Darwish
Linutronix GmbH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-12 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-11 17:28 [PATCH] scsi: libsas and users: Remove notifier indirection John Garry
2021-01-11 17:41 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2021-01-11 17:44 ` John Garry
2021-01-11 17:52 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2021-01-11 19:49 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-11 19:49 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-12 11:25 ` Ahmed S. Darwish [this message]
2021-01-12 11:27 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X/2HDUmb8L8LPELG@lx-t490 \
--to=a.darwish@linutronix.de \
--cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=intel-linux-scu@intel.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.