From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127B6C433E0 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E15423436 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:35:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4E15423436 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7164B165; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:35:11 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@google.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WgGaPpor5lkT; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:35:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191294B164; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:35:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B71A4B164 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:35:07 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t5CxW9K-slj7 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:35:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com (mail-wm1-f49.google.com [209.85.128.49]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B01114B161 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:35:04 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id y23so1807954wmi.1 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:35:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=k8M4ay0pyWeTUsp8VTnmXaOTFerFbqdBD2/I+a5rVXU=; b=QRj1w8Zq8rESBoWrOk4jhvDSx+r0QWDtuf8GtQvgUpnFqBkcPHdTvb7c85hHF2l7cc qDKLJjq9Ii0ShbvDAU8iPTjVj20pMzOpAmpTWPBPhfpw7RQO8ZxSx4EUM8mZsSiXOwQL mdSHwkiWfb6QKpJX/SX1f5FrqdKK38gVDw2QhYa4LBWQ5jOkpmSnlu6QgdD7PLAOsV1i pjdicHccdwcNo3H+EHeD0jh7OVRjagkZ/8yX0F72Uzi/JeXwMnfHry8HzfWpKUBOJuAj gvO7/YEvY/bLsnuixLd6a0UD+ErWYadkCVa8OGxI4YHgEEgNnjV4lTOzzUhdH+UO71MZ 81gA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=k8M4ay0pyWeTUsp8VTnmXaOTFerFbqdBD2/I+a5rVXU=; b=oaIgXgOwHXoDqiithXHKIEY7wzuXYlyrbwSuPVw2LbLkUzvqg+TRlwr6LEHgm8lOuZ fOtnmaVGYyiIgcsn8cSHshzT3zZd9HZMu7cv31jpm/0TNZjwAeBkK4RrDdLHrXfFqzSY 3ky1fgEA+x6+6Q3VrFoL40j2nzA3vFoIteRa7ZiueWcbSgGURYwwBEE0qBB8IDtMt+0G CBLzczZtDLMnr1cK01D4s2iJNomYV1EvPcEjQkwpXFOq1P46xWEBhdUKImi+m44LGNMP /lKS8ZDW8SDoMANyGfllzP55gaCuuzM+XYcZYby8JtQ0/hUr9YvsQmAMySRGspHr159a LU5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rdOkGA67h5GdQvBVB6PIhTUD+/ZjA18dp/dpy5Om+A7dVHxlC cSai/RxzBm0hqNF4Ympz+yQ56g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeEFIkF9DIJ5QpLZTm88kYBUJZLogYBqCXhodFTAckts1/BoAtWv9HKHGKxjjjbk2k938twA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7f83:: with SMTP id a125mr2516711wmd.86.1610548503499; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (230.69.233.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.233.69.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v7sm3410751wma.26.2021.01.13.06.35.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:35:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:35:00 +0000 From: Quentin Perret To: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/26] KVM: arm64: Enable access to sanitized CPU features at EL2 Message-ID: References: <20210108121524.656872-1-qperret@google.com> <20210108121524.656872-14-qperret@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Frank Rowand , android-kvm@google.com, Catalin Marinas , Fuad Tabba , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Wednesday 13 Jan 2021 at 14:23:03 (+0000), Quentin Perret wrote: > Good point, that would be nice indeed. Can I use that from outside an > __init function? Just gave it a go, and the answer to this appears to be yes, surprisingly -- I was expecting a compile-time warning similar to what we get when non-__init code calls into __init, but that doesn't seem to trigger here. Anyways, I'll add the annotation in v3. Thanks, Quentin _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9673AC433E0 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B7BD23436 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:37:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3B7BD23436 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=RT7/z2DMBPquhQWb4nV3NLWOwu+ZDLbTeZfVjqy+6W0=; b=GIN/FXw0C+HaWJDNNJQ8eAg7W I57qRTzhfvskhR5KC0npfNUH3Z2njs7WtBxV7RQc5UEFgQHFy60xVAS3Wze1rC01uuUapIS/vPVob 8FRWj8iJKHW7NN+Oh0tbNqODpVLA70lSb4Eqs6YgTS36cbvCnYeSRSUs1ccRD5zukpnmSRwAvTo2R T/gkYT23HAh50jZDZFFidIXezMcEiODepr7LBTx9U7lEmVY7fgVuWGZPsyF8CJUe1GoW/qSZNfSY5 xhM4M5zbHZ4t2t3obPJ903oCA7gPynaiazKMMzMr+VTO3y7AOubzOjSZGxlcI4WKfsR8yILjh9O40 ODPF6c8zA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kzhF1-0000c5-Dd; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:35:20 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kzhEn-0000ZH-4Q for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:35:08 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id a6so1805642wmc.2 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:35:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=k8M4ay0pyWeTUsp8VTnmXaOTFerFbqdBD2/I+a5rVXU=; b=QRj1w8Zq8rESBoWrOk4jhvDSx+r0QWDtuf8GtQvgUpnFqBkcPHdTvb7c85hHF2l7cc qDKLJjq9Ii0ShbvDAU8iPTjVj20pMzOpAmpTWPBPhfpw7RQO8ZxSx4EUM8mZsSiXOwQL mdSHwkiWfb6QKpJX/SX1f5FrqdKK38gVDw2QhYa4LBWQ5jOkpmSnlu6QgdD7PLAOsV1i pjdicHccdwcNo3H+EHeD0jh7OVRjagkZ/8yX0F72Uzi/JeXwMnfHry8HzfWpKUBOJuAj gvO7/YEvY/bLsnuixLd6a0UD+ErWYadkCVa8OGxI4YHgEEgNnjV4lTOzzUhdH+UO71MZ 81gA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=k8M4ay0pyWeTUsp8VTnmXaOTFerFbqdBD2/I+a5rVXU=; b=LUagVpRCLr3ficV3RQP5XQ7f1M9tkhnr8GcWxLCVPtmy2yyRhbhw1wdWX6kL57IE58 +9Z9zDvnTO3e3VCGtpJBydlr9nkHTTYWsEeb2weYJwO8r62d/5cYG5leX+UDkpuXsMj7 1FpFZNx5V6mk6kffTICGKixp783DUTyFe+Xr5y2ynk/qTOvr7Z4WVA/s+7q/Q1GT/aBz N5FE93ZUQi/SzCVNZrkT1yG5n0+U0qZd+qluzqDR3/qu4ZdwbDkTW0TvTbgSqfr3plCo +J5vXW7anPZTrdSuKiutPJxFQQfG1VoO1/cYPfNc2MEqc2j9vHh3VhOmAODQkCiiFjGz uCZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Oc0Ez+6DauYh6P9XWV3AyGPrJ48CTgQGZWTpSQKF9RPJ11R3y irJG+KeazODdLS11fAhJuovWEw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeEFIkF9DIJ5QpLZTm88kYBUJZLogYBqCXhodFTAckts1/BoAtWv9HKHGKxjjjbk2k938twA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7f83:: with SMTP id a125mr2516711wmd.86.1610548503499; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (230.69.233.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.233.69.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v7sm3410751wma.26.2021.01.13.06.35.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:35:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:35:00 +0000 From: Quentin Perret To: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/26] KVM: arm64: Enable access to sanitized CPU features at EL2 Message-ID: References: <20210108121524.656872-1-qperret@google.com> <20210108121524.656872-14-qperret@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210113_093505_321574_A7DB3760 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.39 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Frank Rowand , Suzuki K Poulose , android-kvm@google.com, Catalin Marinas , Fuad Tabba , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , James Morse , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, David Brazdil , Will Deacon , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Julien Thierry Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 13 Jan 2021 at 14:23:03 (+0000), Quentin Perret wrote: > Good point, that would be nice indeed. Can I use that from outside an > __init function? Just gave it a go, and the answer to this appears to be yes, surprisingly -- I was expecting a compile-time warning similar to what we get when non-__init code calls into __init, but that doesn't seem to trigger here. Anyways, I'll add the annotation in v3. Thanks, Quentin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B970C433E0 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0341923433 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727047AbhAMOgM (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:36:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38358 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726770AbhAMOgL (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:36:11 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE789C0617A3 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:35:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id e25so1815133wme.0 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:35:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=k8M4ay0pyWeTUsp8VTnmXaOTFerFbqdBD2/I+a5rVXU=; b=QRj1w8Zq8rESBoWrOk4jhvDSx+r0QWDtuf8GtQvgUpnFqBkcPHdTvb7c85hHF2l7cc qDKLJjq9Ii0ShbvDAU8iPTjVj20pMzOpAmpTWPBPhfpw7RQO8ZxSx4EUM8mZsSiXOwQL mdSHwkiWfb6QKpJX/SX1f5FrqdKK38gVDw2QhYa4LBWQ5jOkpmSnlu6QgdD7PLAOsV1i pjdicHccdwcNo3H+EHeD0jh7OVRjagkZ/8yX0F72Uzi/JeXwMnfHry8HzfWpKUBOJuAj gvO7/YEvY/bLsnuixLd6a0UD+ErWYadkCVa8OGxI4YHgEEgNnjV4lTOzzUhdH+UO71MZ 81gA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=k8M4ay0pyWeTUsp8VTnmXaOTFerFbqdBD2/I+a5rVXU=; b=AavHoCHCedjmHzKXcBQo9KKOsFRCNCEy5E/0HYQe0rMTIAmnGC7Wy3qwB7u0Cth1Mj NGLZjJiYKJglpgrbW8j1OGb9pRP9lHH5CoN5PEiEEw08dREbgfua42LXHoWzbryWCf9m Vn9/569nkLF1bTQj8DLv3Wmhc5skLbSYyHyxkBAPgCftx6IXWBEyrQlQxn/1H5zvxpRY 5uykykFQQRDCgmBGiXusyFWnBRtS3qmlBhI3SWPaxlUhpEjZMARdPymvnbqVhGTjubIT ipBPmXeirwk53PSnE4uHpNGvAtc/aLMF24PptLsUh6N5LRmLCgdzyhJHtbPFME3HEx9q WNWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BfdRrBipf3aouSwOLdr/3hrQxvs1L5PUChn1n1CfrV2I0Xssk 96BK60LKlI5gsNO6gQhSEfB8lg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeEFIkF9DIJ5QpLZTm88kYBUJZLogYBqCXhodFTAckts1/BoAtWv9HKHGKxjjjbk2k938twA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7f83:: with SMTP id a125mr2516711wmd.86.1610548503499; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (230.69.233.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.233.69.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v7sm3410751wma.26.2021.01.13.06.35.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:35:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:35:00 +0000 From: Quentin Perret To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, android-kvm@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Fuad Tabba , Mark Rutland , David Brazdil Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/26] KVM: arm64: Enable access to sanitized CPU features at EL2 Message-ID: References: <20210108121524.656872-1-qperret@google.com> <20210108121524.656872-14-qperret@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 13 Jan 2021 at 14:23:03 (+0000), Quentin Perret wrote: > Good point, that would be nice indeed. Can I use that from outside an > __init function? Just gave it a go, and the answer to this appears to be yes, surprisingly -- I was expecting a compile-time warning similar to what we get when non-__init code calls into __init, but that doesn't seem to trigger here. Anyways, I'll add the annotation in v3. Thanks, Quentin