From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, peterz@infradead.org, aarcange@redhat.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: introduce definitions to support static calls for kvm_x86_ops
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:17:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/8rIgrMkb61/la9@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee071807-5ce5-60c1-c5df-b0b3e068b2ba@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> If you need to choose between DECLARE_STATIC_CALL_NULL and
> DECLARE_STATIC_CALL, you can have kvm-x86-ops.h use one of two macros
> KVM_X86_OP_NULL and KVM_X86_OP.
>
> #define KVM_X86_OP(func) \
> DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(kvm_x86_##func, \
> *(((struct kvm_x86_ops *)0)->func));
>
> #define KVM_X86_OP_NULL(func) \
> DECLARE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(kvm_x86_##func, \
Gah, DECLARE_STATIC_CALL_NULL doesn't exist, though it's referenced in a comment.
I assume these should be s/DECLARE/DEFINE? I haven't fully grokked the static
call code yet...
> *(((struct kvm_x86_ops *)0)->func));
>
> #include <asm/kvm-x86-ops.h>
>
> ...
>
> #define KVM_X86_OP(func) \
> static_call_update(kvm_x86_##func, kvm_x86_ops.func)
> #define KVM_X86_OP_NULL(func) \
> static_call_update(kvm_x86_##func, kvm_x86_ops.func)
> #include <asm/kvm-x86-ops.h>
>
> In that case vmx.c and svm.c could define KVM_X86_OP_NULL to an empty string
> and list the optional callbacks manually.
>
> Paolo
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-13 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-11 16:57 [PATCH 0/2] Use static_call for kvm_x86_ops Jason Baron
2021-01-11 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: introduce definitions to support static calls " Jason Baron
2021-01-12 23:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-13 4:12 ` Jason Baron
2021-01-13 12:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-13 16:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-13 12:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-13 16:16 ` Jason Baron
2021-01-13 16:30 ` Jason Baron
2021-01-13 17:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-13 17:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-13 17:17 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-01-11 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: use static calls to reduce kvm_x86_ops overhead Jason Baron
2021-01-11 17:31 ` [PATCH 0/2] Use static_call for kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X/8rIgrMkb61/la9@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.